Mscriv

I reverted your edits to All Weather Running Tracks. Here is what I wrote, essentially to you, on the discussion page.

Twice someone has come in to remove comments, I am guessing involving the Mercury accusation, without referencing. I've added additional references to back up the claim. If there is a dispute on that fact or any fact, please reference the opposing position, but do not just remove information you don't like. This is an encyclopedia. Neutrality of the information is sought.

If the issue was the list of competing vendors in the marketplace, then please ADD to the list for completeness, not simply delete the names of competitors.

When editing a statement, please leave the article with complete sentences.

If you have more to offer on the subject, I am more than willing to discuss this with you to see if we can phrase this as accurately as possible.

Again

You've again removed the mention of Mercury from the same article. I'm not sure what your motive is in this, but it seems commercial in nature. I have close to a dozen sources that discuss Mercury in Tartan brand running tracks of the past--it is obviously a historical fact. [1] being the most visible. The APS company is using that as a sales point, I'd rather not use a commercial site as primary evidence, but with the number of other sites concurring, its not them alone. There is some additional inference that other brands used or possibly still use Mercury in their process. Removing the reference and the information does not alone disprove this point. Its a fact of life, it should get mentioned properly.Trackinfo (talk) 22:05, 18 February 2010 (UTC)