February 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Angel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Hersfold tool account(talk) 20:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

thanks,I'll take your advice into consideration! x
I'm sorry, I only just noticed your message - I've had quite a few today and yours ended up buried amongst them.
When I came across that edit in Huggle, all I saw at first was your adding "your breasts dilated with joy", which isn't something you usually see added to articles. Looking into it further, a lot of what you were adding did seem to be unencyclopedic in tone, and consisting mostly of original research. Your edits since then look fine, so if you can provide some references for the content I'd reverted, that'd be great. Thanks! Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:05, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
::: thanks, i can see now you were right to revert the kids change , sorry for complaining Mrthekid97 (talk) 13:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)Reply