Mrt23498

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Wales has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Steve Crossin (talk) 08:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:The Serbian City.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:The Serbian City.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Golden Gate (Jerusalem)‎. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 22:12, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:4520610321_pre.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:4520610321_pre.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 14:53, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Susco Septima

A tag has been placed on Susco Septima, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blowdart | ^talk 11:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User:Ultraexactzz, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 13:39, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

After seeing your personal attack at User talk:Nancy, here, I have blocked you from editing, per below. In the future, however much you may disagree with the edits or actions of others, please refrain from personal attacks. Thank you. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 13:42, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Personal Attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 13:42, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Monroeville, Alabama has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 10:50, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to User:Epbr123 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. tutterMouse (talk) 10:53, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User:TutterMouse. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. tutterMouse (talk) 10:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:TutterMouse. tutterMouse (talk) 10:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 5608 BC

A tag has been placed on 5608 BC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. PoinDexta1 | Talk to Me | 09:23, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Citadel (Muslimgauze album). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. ϢereSpielChequers 09:26, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Because of the edits you made today, you've won yourself a permanent vacation from Wikipedia! Isn't that exciting? Contributing to articles can be very stressful and time-consuming, and it's just too much for some people to handle. So I've set you free! Take a nap in a hammock, walk on the beach, fly a kite, or build a tree house. If hang gliding or racing motorcycles is more your speed, you can do that, too! You can do whatever you like, as long as you're not editing Wikipedia. Hooray for you!

Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 09:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Your email

If you would like to request this block to be lifted, you can make a statement here. If you prefer, you can use the {{unblock}} template to ask for an uninvolved admin to review your reason. I'm inclined to lift the block, if you are active again and want to contribute constructively. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 21:13, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Picture22.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Picture22.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:23, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Statement

I would like to be unblocked please, my actions four years ago were unwarranted and I apologise, I would like to contribute constructively. [Kafziel] please? mrt23498rules (talk) 12:52, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

[east718] As above, please unblock/undelete me? mrt23498rules (talk) 23:05, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mrt23498 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It has been such a long time since my block my wish is to edit constructively mrt23498rules (talk) 23:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I will be watching your edits closely. If you resume vandalising Wikipedia you will be blocked indefinitely with out an additional warning. I advise you to proceed with caution until you re-familiarize yourself with Wikipedia. Mkdw^talk 08:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)