User talk:Mrholybrain/Archive-Apr2007
You've been approved to use VandalSniper. Please let me know if you have any problems getting it working. --Chris (talk) 01:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
User talk:163.167.129.124 edit
Stop it and check your facts! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 163.167.129.124 (talk • contribs) 14:43, March 23, 2007 (UTC).
- You are violating policy and impersonating a user. Those are the facts. mrholybrain's talk 16:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- What is your evidence? When that message is shown to be genuine I hope you will apologise for harassing me! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 163.167.129.124 (talk) 16:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC).
- I will, but it is not genuine. If it is, then prove it. mrholybrain's talk 16:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I don't need to prove anything to you. The administrators you have reported me to can investigate (and then you can apologise). 163.167.129.124 16:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- No apology then..? You may want to refer to WP:AN/I to see how many peoples time you have wasted this afternoon! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 163.167.129.124 (talk • contribs) 17:09 March 23, 2007 (UTC).
- Okay, so the message was genuine, however, it is still bad practice to copy and paste people's comments like that. I am leaving another message on your talk page later. mrholybrain's talk 19:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Please see here
- Okay, so the message was genuine, however, it is still bad practice to copy and paste people's comments like that. I am leaving another message on your talk page later. mrholybrain's talk 19:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- No apology then..? You may want to refer to WP:AN/I to see how many peoples time you have wasted this afternoon! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 163.167.129.124 (talk • contribs) 17:09 March 23, 2007 (UTC).
- I don't need to prove anything to you. The administrators you have reported me to can investigate (and then you can apologise). 163.167.129.124 16:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I will, but it is not genuine. If it is, then prove it. mrholybrain's talk 16:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- What is your evidence? When that message is shown to be genuine I hope you will apologise for harassing me! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 163.167.129.124 (talk) 16:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC).
163.167.129.124 12:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- You still have not cited policy, only a WP:AN/I discussion. mrholybrain's talk 14:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- AND you have not apologised! I suggest you actually read the policies you are referring to. Firstly, I have not got any "warnings" to remove and secondly "archiving of one's own user talk page is not required. A user may simply delete any comments they have read, whether they have acted on them or not." I personally don't give a monkey's what is displayed on the page (although the point is they do not refer to me as this is not my own computer), I just WILL NOT be bullied and harassed by you. I intend to pursue this matter as a breach of the 3RR and do not wish to have any further communication with you. For the last time of asking, please leave me alone. 163.167.129.124 09:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Discussion moved to WP:AN/3RR. mrholybrain's talk 11:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- AND you have not apologised! I suggest you actually read the policies you are referring to. Firstly, I have not got any "warnings" to remove and secondly "archiving of one's own user talk page is not required. A user may simply delete any comments they have read, whether they have acted on them or not." I personally don't give a monkey's what is displayed on the page (although the point is they do not refer to me as this is not my own computer), I just WILL NOT be bullied and harassed by you. I intend to pursue this matter as a breach of the 3RR and do not wish to have any further communication with you. For the last time of asking, please leave me alone. 163.167.129.124 09:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- You still have not cited policy, only a WP:AN/I discussion. mrholybrain's talk 14:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Removal of warnings edit
Since this is a relatively common mistake, I'm going to presume you made it in good faith. However, I'm afraid you're in the wrong on this one. A user may remove material from his or her userspace, and someone else may not edit war to put it back. If it's necessary to report someone for disruption who's been warned and removed the warnings, just note that in your report-they're always in history regardless. Seraphimblade Talk to me 12:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- To clarify, in this case you had no reason to warn or report me for disruption. Unlike yourself, I have never been formally warned about anything. 163.167.129.124 12:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Whatever. I am just going to drop it, because I have better things to do. mrholybrain's talk 15:26, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Dear Mrholybrain, I object to you reverting my edit of the T.J._Maxx page. I hope you agree with me that compromising the security of 45 MILLION customers is a serious affair. In fact, there is no reason for ANY company to save customer credit card numbers, social security numbers, etc. , for many years. This is just dangerous. If you think my initial statement was too blunt, feel free to alter it to make it more conservative. --me (82.73.198.140)
- Yes, it is, but your comment was quite POV. mrholybrain's talk 21:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I will rephrase in a more neutral manner. --me (82.73.198.140)
checkuser edit
I am trying to add comments on the Dereks1x checkuser request but it doesn't appear on the main page after I enter it in [1]. It only appears here [2]
- Here's what I am trying to add...can you help add it or explain the problem?Doc United States 03:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Doc United States answering to the accusation of "trying to pass off false credentials"
I've just been alerted that there is a checkuser request.
- Here's proof that I am an M.D. (physician). [3] and[4] and Picture of diploma.
- Let me know where I can fax a copy of my M.D. diploma so that the wikipedia head can see it.
- Checkuser for this purpose is an invasion of privacy (confirmed by wikipedia rules)
- According to my check, Dereks1x's block is over but that's between him and you.
- At this point, the two experts who have written have a unanimous opinion. Neither is advocating a position in the discussion other than to give medical facts.
- The most important point is that there be no doubt of my credentials so let me know if you need further information.
Doc United States 02:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC) Doc United States 03:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC) Thanks, anyway. Must have been a cyberspace delay because text is appearing now.Doc United States 04:03, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism on McDonalds' Canada Menu edit
Thanks for reverting that vandalism! I had to get rid of even more. The vandalism on that page is starting to get out of hand! Greenboxed 00:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi! just a point on the number of diffs in 3RR violation cases, that can't be 4 diffs per user, since the idea behind code E is to spot times when a user uses 2 different accounts to violate 3RR. So you have 3 diffs for user A and 1 for user B for example, if you can show a link, 3RR was violated :) -- lucasbfr talk 07:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
About the fischerspooner album cover edit
I'm sorry I didn't list a fair use rational. I thought I had done everthing right, but guesse not. One thing I'm a littel confused about is why no one was able to write one for the page. But oh well. Is there any way I can get the original copy of that page so I can add the fair use line? Max18well 04:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well, if you still have the original image, just upload it again with a rationale this time. If you don't ask I administrator to give you a copy of the deleted image so you can reupload it. mrholybrain's talk 13:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)