Your submission at Articles for creation: Monro (January 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 06:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mragoplay123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 06:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Monro

edit

  Hello, Mragoplay123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Monro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Monro has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Monro. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:20, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monro (October 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 13:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hey Devonian,
References 2, 3, 4 and 5 are all articles directly associated with the subject, not based around people he's associated with. Reference 3 talks about his contributions towards Sinead Harnett's songs too - is that a viable way to incorporate his production work for that artist?
Reference 7 I can update with a direct article from the foundation.
For reference 8, the section on Monro is made up of around 20% of the word count in this article, does that not count as more than a 'passing mention'? Reference 18 is made up of a similar percentage of article wording too.
On a side note - this guy has obviously contributed a lot to other peoples careers and it's detailed in verified places like Spotify crediting, Genius, articles etc. The makeup of it all is that he's well known and accomplished, but sometimes it's not as clear cut in terms of a full scale article about him anywhere. I'd love for him to get his flowers - how do I showcase his credentials in a way that can be accepted?
Sorry I'm new to this and figuring it out, appreciate your help and patience in advance. Mragoplay123 (talk) 13:59, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply