Mr Richy
|
April 2011 edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Web browsers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 07:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, but why talk about vandalism? Opera, is not now at version 11, as by me indicated?
- --Mr Richy (talk) 04:43, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Excuse me? You don't know? Strange, ... but okay, I tell you:
Template:Web browsers is a NavBox (navigation template) and is meant to help people reach articles quickly. Now, there is an independent article called Opera 10 but no independent article as Opera 11. (Opera 11 page redirects to History of the Opera web browser, which is already on the NavBox.) So, by changing "10" to "11", you just deter people's access.
I am half-sorry to have misunderstood you, but on the other hand, it is very strange that you didn't know! Fleet Command (talk) 05:55, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi there.
Why did you move the voice to AC Perugia (Umbria) while the official name is AC Perugia Calcio? Thanks --Juanm (talk) 07:23, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hi ... for the next time Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Uncontroversial_requests ;) --Juanm (talk) 06:54, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- definitely not ;) --Juanm (talk) 07:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of 2011–12 Eccellenza season for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011–12 Eccellenza season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 Eccellenza season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Night of the Big Wind talk 13:34, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 2011–12 Eccellenza season edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on 2011–12 Eccellenza season, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:33, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Attempting to overturn consensus at a deletion discussion by simply ignoring it and re-creating the deleted page is unacceptable. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:40, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
The article U.S. Agropoli 1921 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Appearently non-notable amateur football club. No claim to notability. No independent refs. No entry in the italian wikipedia.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Not your siblings' deletionist (talk) 07:37, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
The article A.S.D. San Cesareo Calcio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Appearently non-notable amateur football club. No claim to notability. No independent refs. No entry in the italian wikipedia.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Not your siblings' deletionist (talk) 07:38, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
The article U.S.D. FiesoleCaldine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Appearently non-notable amateur football club. No claim to notability. No independent refs. No entry in the italian wikipedia.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Not your siblings' deletionist (talk) 07:39, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
September 2013 edit
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to F.C. Real Città di Vico Equense may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- position = [[Serie D|Serie D/G]], 15th (as Real Hyria Nola)) |
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of History of Città di Potenza S.S. for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of Città di Potenza S.S. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Città di Potenza S.S. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Endercase (talk) 19:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC)