Mr Hall of England
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
November 2020 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Wug·a·po·des 01:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)- You have been asked to stop replacing links to redirects with piped links because it is against our guidelines at WP:NOTBROKEN. Despite these warnings, you are still replacing links, and the speed at which you are doing this makes me believe you may be using automated tools without permission. Mking a lot of changes quickly when those changes are against policy is still unacceptable even if done by hand. This is also not the first time you have continued to make edits after being asked to stop. For all these reasons, I have removed your ability to edit articles until you convince an administrator that you will stop making these edits and will listen when editors complain about your editing. There is currently a discussion at the administrator's noticeboard which you were notified about almost 5 hours ago. Please engage in that discussion. — Wug·a·po·des 01:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Mr Hall of England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Sorry about that, I am trying to get the correct link to the page, I have a learning disability, I have done quite a few good things on Wikipedia, one of my projects is to get the Old Trafford links to the right place as the Cricket Old Trafford in some links. Also Old Trafford, Greater Manchester links should be moved to Old Trafford (area). There are 177 Old Trafford (football ground) which should be moved to Old Trafford Mr Hall of England (talk) 14:07, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 14:54, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mr Hall of England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have read the guidelines and apologise to the individual, I won't do it again unless it has a reason. Mr Hall of England (talk) 18:09, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This does not convince me that you understand what you did wrong, why you continued to edit the way you did after being asked to stop, or how you will change your behviour in future. You will need to explain all this before we can consider unblocking you. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 18:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I would suggest you take some time to look for a mentor, someone who is prepared to monitor your edits and help guide you as to what and what is not acceptable around here. Otherwise you're not getting back in this game. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 19:11, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Mr Hall of England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I will stop doing the correct edits. I will make a comment after editing in future. Mr Hall of England (talk) 19:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This vague statement doesn't address why you were blocked. Also, your talk page is huge. Please see H:ARC and follow the instructions. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:55, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mr Hall of England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have learned my lesson, I have had a nice break from articles, my main concentration will be the Peerage and sport from now on. I was wandering if @DrKay can help me with the Peerage please? Mr Hall of England (talk) 19:44, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- And what lesson have you learned? You've not once suggested any understanding of why you are blocked. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 19:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- Alright I won't change a redirect. Mr Hall of England (talk) 19:50, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Mr Hall of England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have learned my lesson, I have looked at the guide. I have the Peerage to edit. This is my main concern as the UK Barons are not finished yet. Mr Hall of England (talk) 17:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I know it must feel like we're messing you around, but I think you're missing the point. Saying "I have learned my lesson" is all very well, but you're giving us no indication that you actually understand why you were blocked, and if you don't understand why you've been blocked we have no reason to think you won't go back to doing it. You can't just say "I won't do it again", you need to explain (briefly) what you're not going to do again and why. Nobody wants to keep you blocked—you obviously want to help—but at the moment I have no way to judge whether the moment I unblock you you're going to go back to wasting other people's time, and the time of those other people is equally as valuable as yours. As an absolute basic start: do you understand what we mean by "cosmetic change" and "automated tool"? I think some of the problem here may be that you don't understand why what you're doing is against Wikipedia's rules. ‑ Iridescent 18:33, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mr Hall of England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have a moderator User:Valereee, I hope that I will return to editing to wikipedia, but it is up to the Guardians of Wikipedia. Mr Hall of England (talk) 17:49, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Only one open unblock request at a time, please. Multiple requests will not serve to bring the process to a conclusion any sooner. SQLQuery me! 16:04, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mr Hall of England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I commit to ignoring redirects and will not try to "fix" them from here going forward. If I find a redirect that seems incorrect, I will ask at Teahouse for advice and help. I also will do my best to stay on top of messages and respond to them. I will keep Edit summary prompts turned on and commit to using edit summaries explaining all edits Mr Hall of England (talk) 19:57, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Your message on my talk page edit
Hi Mr Hall, I'm sorry but I don't have the time at present to be able to mentor you for editing - are the other any editors who you know who you might be able to approach? Apologies for not being able to help at the moment. Maybe try the Rugby Union project page to see if someone can help? I won't be able to update the Six Nations page as requested and will remove that from my talk page as it makes it a bit long. Sorry --Bcp67 (talk) 15:04, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- One think you do need to do is keep your talk page for messages rather than for testing out edits. You can create a sandbox for that by starting a new page as User:Mr Hall of England/sandbox and do your practise edits there. The talk page should just be for people to put messages for you.--Bcp67 (talk) 15:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- ↑ Mr Hall of England, read the above and take it seriously. You still have access to your sandbox if you want to draft content; the fact that you're continuing to abuse this talkpage—which belongs to Wikipedia, not to you, and is intended only for communication—not only means you'll have talkpage access revoked if you keep it up but means you're demonstrating that you have no intention of following Wikipedia's rules and consequently will have any future unblock requests declined. That would be a really lame hill to die on. ‑ Iridescent 21:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Let's talk about this edit
Hi, Mr. Hall! I see you're having problems here. I am going to suggest you temporarily put aside your current goal of finishing the Peerage, and also put your unblock request on hold. If you'll do that, I'll work with you here on your talk page to better understand how things went wrong here on Wikipedia for you. I can't commit to an ongoing mentorship, but I will try to help you get to the point where an administrator might be willing to consider unblocking you. Ping me if you respond or I might not see it. —valereee (talk) 18:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Thanks @User:ValereeeMr Hall of England (talk) 21:38, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Great. Okay, first a bit of housekeeping: I'd like to get your work plan off your talk page, as this page should be only where you interact with other editors. It looks like you can do that yourself; please do it. You can move it to your user page if you like.
- Second, enable Preferences>Gadgets>Browsing>Navigation popups.
- Third, enable Preferences>Editor>Editing>Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
- Ping me when you've done that. Best to you! —valereee (talk) 22:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- I will do that tomorrow evening. Thanks for the help.Mr Hall of England (talk) 22:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Mr Hall of England, okay, now everything below this section needs to be moved to your user page, where you've got other notes to yourself and stuff you've worked on/want to work on. Your talk page is only for discussing things with other editors and should contain minimal other stuff.
- Let me know when you've done that, too. —valereee (talk) 10:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- I will do that tomorrow evening. Thanks for the help.Mr Hall of England (talk) 22:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Redirects and piped links edit
Great, thanks! Okay, we can work on understanding the reasons for the block, which is the most important issue here. First, let's talk about how you learn best. You've been pointed, apparently a few times, at WP:NOTBROKEN. I'm thinking maybe reading long passages is not a great way for you to learn, is that true? It's fine if it's not, we can work with it. —valereee (talk) 18:39, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- OK then @—valereee
- Okay, since reading long passages isn't a good way for you to learn, you're going to have to follow one really hard-and-fast rule: if another experienced editor tells you something about policy, you can either 1. believe them and stop doing what you're doing or 2. ask for advice at Teahouse before making any similar edits.
- This means you need to simply accept that redirects do not need to be piped, and in fact it is unhelpful to "fix" them. And since you don't understand the reasoning behind that, you need to simply ignore all redirects from here going forward. If you find a redirect that you believe truly is incorrect, you need to ask about it at Teahouse instead of "fixing" it.
- Do you think you can commit to that? —valereee (talk) 15:30, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Copied from my talk:
Unblocking edit
Thanks for the advice and help. Will be willing.Mr Hall of England (talk) 21:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC) I have done all the advice you have doneMr Hall of England (talk) 22:35, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Done that Mr Hall of England (talk) 18:28, 20 November 2020 (UTC) I have done that now, I agree I don't like reading long things. Mr Hall of England (talk) 15:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC) I can commit to that. Mr Hall of England (talk) 15:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Great! Let's move on. (You can reply on this page, to keep discussion in one spot.)
Additional concerns expressed edit
Okay, the other concern expressed was that you didn't respond to messages. Whenever you start an editing session, check to see if anyone has left you a message. If so, check to see what they're messaging you about. It could be about something you did in your last editing session.
You've enabled edit summary prompting, which will help you get in the habit of leaving an edit summary for every edit. Edit summaries are just as important as the edits themselves; they tell other editors why you're doing something.
You've also enabled navigation popups, which lets you hover over another editor's name and see how long they've been editing/how many edits they have. Generally if someone with more than 10,000 edits is telling you something about policy, they're quite likely correct. Either believe them, or ask at Teahouse.
Can you commit to responding to messages and using edit summaries? —valereee (talk) 15:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- YesMr Hall of England (talk) 15:57, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- Okay, why don't you try making another unblock request? I would recommend you use something like this as your reason:
- I commit to ignoring redirects and will not try to "fix" them from here going forward. If I find a redirect that seems incorrect, I will ask at Teahouse for advice and help. I also will do my best to stay on top of messages and respond to them. I will keep Edit summary prompts turned on and commit to using edit summaries explaining all edits.
- —valereee (talk) 16:12, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
I am committing to editing but not committing to redirecting Mr Hall of England (talk) 18:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean by "not committing to redirecting".
- Here is what we need you to commit to, and to make a statement as a reason in your unblock request:
-
- We need you to commit to not editing redirects.
- We need you to commit to using edit summaries.
- We need you to commit to answering messages.
- We need you to commit to asking for advice at the Teahouse if you think there's a redirect that needs to be "fixed".
- —valereee (talk) 18:21, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
I will commit to them, where is the teahouse? Mr Hall of England (talk) 18:23, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- Teahouse is at WP:Teahouse. You'll need to revise your unblock reason above. —valereee (talk) 18:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
message at my talk edit
re: your comment at my talk: Hi I haven't heard about my blocking lifted. Hope you are well, stay safe. Thank you for the well-wishes, I hope you are well and staying safe, too. You didn't respond to the block in a way that other administrators would likely accept. Please read the section just above, Additional concerns expressed.
Here are the pertinent parts:
Here is what we need you to commit to, and to make a statement as a reason in your unblock request: We need you to commit to not editing redirects. We need you to commit to using edit summaries. We need you to commit to answering messages. We need you to commit to asking for advice at the Teahouse if you think there's a redirect that needs to be "fixed".
You'll need to add to an unblock request a reason addressing all of these. As I suggested before, something like:
I commit to ignoring redirects and will not try to "fix" them from here going forward. If I find a redirect that seems incorrect, I will ask at Teahouse for advice and help. I also will do my best to stay on top of messages and respond to them. I will keep Edit summary prompts turned on and commit to using edit summaries explaining all edits.
—valereee (talk) 20:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
I will commit to those values Mr Hall of England (talk) 20:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Titles in remainder of other titles edit
| UK Title(s) | Other Titles | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Earl of Wilton |  Marquess of Westminster
|
Created for Thomas Egerton with remainder to his Grandson Thomas Grosvenor who was the 2nd son of The 1st Marquess of Westminster. |
| Earl Granville | Marquess of Stafford
|
Created for Lord Granville Leveson-Gower, Leveson-Gower who was the 2nd son of The 1st Marquess of Stafford. |
| Earl of Effingham |  Duke of Norfolk
|
|
| Earl of Strafford | Viscount Torrington
|
|
| Earl Cowley |  Earl of Mornington
|
|
| Earl Russell | Duke of Bedford
|
Created for Lord John Russell who was the former Prime Minister, Russell was the 3rd son of The 6th Duke of Bedford. |
| Earl of Wharncliffe |  Earl of Bute
|
|
| Earl of Plymouth | Earl of Powis
|
|
| Earl of Gowrie | Lord Ruthven of Freeland
|
|
| Earl Alexander of Tunis | Earl of Caledon
|
|
| Viscount Bridport | Viscount Hood
|
|
| Viscount Ullswater |  Earl of Lonsdale
|
|
| Viscount Bridgeman | Earl of Bradford
|
|
| Viscount Daventry | Baron Southampton
|
Created for Muriel FitzRoy who was the widow of Speaker Edward FitzRoy who died in office, FitzRoy was the 2nd son of The 3rd Baron Southampton and Great-Grandson of The 2nd Duke of Grafton. |
| Duke of Grafton
| ||
| Viscount Chandos | Viscount Cobham
|
|
| Viscount Tenby | Earl Lloyd-George of Dwyfor
|
|
| Viscount Stuart of Findhorn | Earl of Moray
|
|
| Viscount Blakenham | Earl of Listowel
|
|
| Baron Manners | Duke of Rutland
|
|
| Baron Churchill | Duke of Marlborough (title)
|
|
| [[]] |  [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | [[]]
|
|
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] | |
| [[]] | {{}} [[]] |
Hey, Mr Hall! This table probably belongs on your user page instead of your user talk. Your user talk is for discussion between you and other editors. Your user page is for things like notes to yourself about what to edit next, like this apparently is. —valereee (talk) 23:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC) Thanks —valereee
Did you put this in my user profile page? edit
I ask (without anger) if you put this on my User Profile page, as I found this among the pictures at the head the page, and you are the only person in the page edit history apart from myself that is down as having edited something in it. It appears to have been an imperfectly put in illustration that failed to illustrate, leaving me to see only this:
| dummysize = {{{size}}}
| align = left | nocat = false
| caption = This editor is an [[Wikipedia:Service awards# (or )|]] and is entitled to display this .
Cloptonson (talk) 21:37, 26 December 2020 (UTC) If indeed you did do this I would appreciate if you could take remedial action so that the image is visible.
Law Officers edit
| # | Attorney General (E&W) and Attorney General (NI) | Solicitor General |
|---|---|---|
| The Baron Mayhew of Twysden | 13 June 1987 – 10 April 1992 | 11 June 1983 – 14 June 1987 |
| The Baron Lyell of Markyate | 10 April 1992 – 2 May 1997 | 13 June 1987 – 10 April 1992 |
| The Baron Morris of Aberavon | 2 May 1997 – 29 July 1999 | |
| The Baron Goldsmith | 8 June 2001 – 27 June 2007 | |
| The Baroness Scotland of Asthal | 27 June 2007 – 11 May 2010 |
7 March 1974 4 May 1979
"Added changes" edit
You've been blocked before for ignoring WP:NOTBROKEN, do you need to be blocked again? DuncanHill (talk) 21:13, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- No I dont't but I have been hacked Mr Hall of England (talk) 18:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
March 2021 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Wug·a·po·des 01:19, 8 March 2021 (UTC)- You said you would stop changing redirect links, and you're back to doing it again. If you have useful changes to make to articles, you can propose them on the article talk page. — Wug·a·po·des 01:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Mr Hall of England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have found my Wikipedia has been hacked editing the Postmaster General of the United Kingdom articles, sorry for the bad news, will try for a better password, plus I would like to have the opportunity to be back, I have in my summary auto filling with the words. Mr Hall of England (talk) 18:56, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
So very sorry, compromised accounts may not be unblocked. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 19:47, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Married Peers edit
Life Peers edit
Hereditary and Life Peers edit
| Baron | Baroness | Marriage | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| [[]] | [[]] | ||
| [[]] | [[]] | ||
| [[]] | [[]] | ||
| [[]] | [[]] | ||
| [[]] | [[]] | ||
| [[]] | [[]] | ||
| [[]] | [[]] | ||
| [[]] | [[]] | ||
| [[]] | [[]] | ||
| [[]] | [[]] |
Hereditary Peerages created since the Life Peerages Act 1958 moved to draftspace edit
An article you recently created, Hereditary Peerages created since the Life Peerages Act 1958, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 19:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tip Mr Hall of England (talk) 19:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
UK DPM Template edit
| Portrait | Deputy Prime Minister | Political Party and position |
Portfolio(s) | Term of office | Ministry | Monarch (Reign) |
Ref. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Took office | Left office | ||||||||
|
The Right Honourable Clement Attlee MP for Limehouse (1883–1967) |
Labour Leader 1958–71 |
|
19 February 1942 |
23 May 1945 |
Churchill War | George VI.svg) (1936–1952) |
[12] | |
Unofficial Deputy Prime Ministers edit
| Portrait | Political Party and position |
Portfolio(s) | Term of office | Ministry | Monarch (Reign) |
Ref. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Took office | Left office | ||||||||
.jpg)
|
The Right Honourable Anthony Eden MP for Warwick and Leamington (1897–1977) |
Conservative | 23 May 1945 |
23 May 1945 |
Churchill Caretaker (Con.–Lib.N.) |
George VI (1936–1952) |
[12] | ||
|
The Right Honourable Herbert Morrison MP for Lewisham East until 1950 MP for Lewisham South from 1950 (1888–1965) |
Labour Deputy Leader 1945–55 |
|
26 July 1945 |
26 October 1951 |
Attlee (I & II) | |||
|
|
The Right Honourable Sir Anthony Eden MP for Warwick and Leamington (1897–1977) |
Conservative | 26 October 1951 |
5 April 1955 |
Churchill III | ||||
Elizabeth II.svg){kind=small} (1952–) | |||||||||
| 6 April 1955 |
9 January 1957 |
Eden | |||||||
| 10 January 1957 |
8 October 1959 |
Macmillan I | |||||||
| 8 October 1959 |
19 October 1963 |
Macmillan II | |||||||
| 19 October 1963 |
16 October 1964 |
Douglas-Home | |||||||
|
The Right Honourable George Brown MP for Belper (1914–1985) |
Labour Deputy Leader 1960–70 |
|
16 October 1964 |
19 June 1970 |
Wilson (I & II) | |||
| 60px | The Right Honourable Reginald Maudling MP for Barnet (1917–1979) |
Conservative Deputy Leader 1965–72 |
20 June 1970 |
18 July 1972 |
Heath | ||||
| 18 July 1972 |
4 March 1974 | ||||||||
| 60px | The Right Honourable Edward Short MP for Newcastle upon Tyne Central (1912–2012) |
Labour Deputy Leader 1972–76 |
5 March 1974 |
8 April 1976 |
Wilson (III & IV) | ||||
| Callaghan | |||||||||
.jpg)
|
The Right Honourable Michael Foot MP for Ebbw Vale (1913–2010) |
Labour Deputy Leader 1976–80 |
8 April 1976 |
4 May 1979 | |||||
| 60px | The Right Honourable William Whitelaw MP for Penrith and The Border (until 1983) The 1st Viscount Whitelaw (since 1983) (1918–1998) |
Conservative Deputy Leader 1975–91 |
4 May 1979 |
11 June 1983 |
Thatcher I | ||||
| 11 June 1983 |
10 January 1988 |
Thatcher II | |||||||
| Thatcher III | |||||||||
| 10 January 1988 |
24 July 1989 | ||||||||
| 28 November 1990 |
10 April 1992 |
Major I | |||||||
| 10 April 1992 |
20 July 1995 |
Major II | |||||||
|
The Right Honourable Harriet Harman MP for Camberwell and Peckham (1950–) |
Labour Deputy Leader 2007–15 |
28 June 2007 |
11 May 2010 |
Brown | ||||
|
The Right Honourable George Osborne MP for Tatton (1971–) |
Conservative | 8 May 2015 |
13 July 2016 |
Cameron II | ||||
| 13 July 2016 |
11 June 2017 |
May I | |||||||
| 11 June 2017 |
24 July 2019 |
May II | |||||||
| 24 July 2019 |
13 December 2019 |
Johnson I | |||||||
| 13 December 2019 |
Johnson II | ||||||||
Conservative Party DPMS edit
| Portrait | Deputy Prime Minister | Political Party and position |
Portfolio(s) | Term of office | Ministry | Monarch (Reign) |
Ref. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Took office | Left office | ||||||||
| 60px | The Right Honourable A MP for [[]] (1XXX–1XXX) |
Labour Deputy Leader 19XX–XX |
|
19 February 1942 |
23 May 1945 |
[[]] | George VI (1936–1952) |
[12] | |
| 60px | The Right Honourable A MP for [[]] (1XXX–1XXX) |
Labour Deputy Leader 19XX–XX |
|
19 February 1942 |
23 May 1945 |
[[]] | George VI (1936–1952) |
[12] | |
| 60px | The Right Honourable A MP for [[]] (1XXX–1XXX) |
Labour Deputy Leader 19XX–XX |
|
19 February 1942 |
23 May 1945 |
[[]] | George VI (1936–1952) |
[12] | |
| 60px | The Right Honourable A MP for [[]] (1XXX–1XXX) |
Labour Deputy Leader 19XX–XX |
|
19 February 1942 |
23 May 1945 |
[[]] | George VI (1936–1952) |
[12] | |
| 60px | The Right Honourable A MP for [[]] (1XXX–1XXX) |
Labour Deputy Leader 19XX–XX |
|
19 February 1942 |
23 May 1945 |
[[]] | George VI (1936–1952) |
[12] | |
Timeline of communications regulators (1954–present) edit
* Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications[13]
Television Regulators edit
* Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications[14]
New OFCOM edit
Unable to compile EasyTimeline input:
Timeline generation failed: More than 10 errors found
Line 31: ScaleMajor = gridcolor:grid1 unit:year increment:1 start:01/01/1940
- Scale attribute 'start' invalid.
Date does not conform to specified DateFormat 'x.y'.
Line 32: ScaleMinor = gridcolor:grid2 unit:month increment:3 start:01/10/1939
- Scale attribute 'start' invalid.
Date does not conform to specified DateFormat 'x.y'.
Line 85: at:07/12/1941 color:red layer:back
- LineData attribute 'at' invalid.
Date does not conform to specified DateFormat 'x.y'.
Line 88: bar:Japan from:start till:19/02/1945 color:JT
- PlotData attribute 'till' invalid.
Date '19/02/1945' does not conform to specified DateFormat x.y.
Line 89: bar:Japan from:19/02/1945 till:14/03/1945 color:AI
- PlotData attribute 'from' invalid.
Date '19/02/1945' does not conform to specified DateFormat x.y.
Line 90: bar:Japan from:14/03/1945 till:01/04/1945 color:JT
- PlotData attribute 'from' invalid.
Date '14/03/1945' does not conform to specified DateFormat x.y.
Line 91: bar:Japan from:01/04/1945 till:22/06/1945 color:AI
- PlotData attribute 'till' invalid.
Date '22/06/1945' does not conform to specified DateFormat x.y.
Line 92: bar:Japan from:22/06/1945 till:02/09/1945 color:JT
- PlotData attribute 'from' invalid.
Date '22/06/1945' does not conform to specified DateFormat x.y.
Line 93: bar:Japan from:02/09/1945 till:end color:AO
- PlotData attribute 'from' invalid.
Date '02/09/1945' does not conform to specified DateFormat x.y.
Line 94: bar:Manchukuo from:start till:02/09/1945 color:JO
- PlotData attribute 'till' invalid.
Date '02/09/1945' does not conform to specified DateFormat x.y.
Line 95: bar:China from:start till:02/09/1945 color:JO
- PlotData attribute 'till' invalid.
Date '02/09/1945' does not conform to specified DateFormat x.y.
Chairman of OFCOM edit
- Maggie Carver 1 January 2021 – present Interim
- Status
| Portrait | Name (Birth–Death) |
Term of office | Honour(s) | Prime Minister | Monarch (Reign) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
David Currie, Baron Currie of Marylebone (1946–) |
2002 | 11 March 2009 | Elizabeth II (1952–present) | ||
|
Colette Bowe (1946–) |
11 March 2009 | 31 March 2014 | |||
|
Patricia Hodgson (1947–) |
1 April 2014 | 31 December 2017 | |||
|
Terence Burns, Baron Burns (1944–) |
1 January 2018 | 31 December 2020 | |||
|
[[]] (–) |
|||||
Reference edit
References
- ^ Until Lady Stewart of Alvechurch's death in 1984.
- ^ Until Lord Llewelyn-Davies' death in 1981.
- ^ After being widowed, Baroness Llewelyn-Davies of Hastoe developed a love affair at the end of her life with Baron Alport, of Colchester in the County of Essex (1961).
- ^ Until Lord Castle's death in 1979.
- ^ Until Lord Howe of Aberavon's death in 2015.
- ^ Until Lord Bannside's death in 2014.
- ^ Until Lord Cheshire's death in 1992.
- ^ Until Lord Gould of Brookwood's death in 2011.
- ^ As a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary.
- ^ Until Lady Brigstocke's death in 2004.
- ^ Until Lady Maddock's death in 2020.
- ^ a b c d e f g Cite error: The named reference
:4was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ "Regulator archives". Ofcom. 24 June 2010.
- ^ "Regulator archives". Ofcom. 24 June 2010.
possibly getting blocked forever edit
Mr Hall of England, I am really concerned that you could get blocked from editing indefinitely.
Multiple editors have tried to talk to you about the issues with your editing. We understand that you have a very difficult time complying with things like not fixing something that you think is broken, even when you've been told many times that it's not broken. But when you "fix" those things, someone else has to come along and put them back. That means you are causing other people extra work.
This is important: You could very soon be declared to be a net negative. That is, your good work is outweighed by the work you cause for other people.
If that happens, you will probably be blocked from editing at all, maybe forever. You won't be able to finish your list of tasks.
Please, stop "fixing" redirects. I know that's really hard. You have to stop. They aren't broken. You need to stop fixing them.
I need you to tell me this:
"I will never edit a redirect ever again, no matter what."
If you cannot make that promise, and stick with it, you are probably never getting unblocked. If you make this promise, and you ever edit a redirect ever again, you will likely be blocked from editing indefinitely. This is really serious. You need to pay attention.
—valereee (talk) 00:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- I will agree to those terms, also I want to get back to editing my Lords pages. Mr Hall of England (talk) 09:56, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Baron Gardner edit
| Barony of Gardner | |
|---|---|
| Creation date | 23 December 1800 (Ire) 27 November 1806 (UK) |
| Created by | King George III (Ire & UK) |
| Peerage | Peerage of Ireland Peerage of the United Kingdom |
| Baronetage | Gardner of Uttoxeter |
| First holder | Alan Gardner, 1st Baron Gardner (Ire & UK) |
| Last holder | Alan Gardner, 3rd Baron Gardner (Ire & UK) |
| Remainder to | The 1st Baron's heirs male of the body lawfully begotten (Ire & UK). |
| Status | Dormant 2 November 1883 |
"No. 15326". The London Gazette. 6 January 1801. p. 40.
"No. 15974". The London Gazette. 11 November 1806. p. 1479.
Alan Gardner, 1st Baron Gardner (1742–1809)
- Alan Gardner, 2nd Baron Gardner (1770–1815)
- Alan Gardner, 3rd Baron Gardner (1810–1883)
- Herbert Gardner, 1st Baron Burghclere (1848—1921), illegitimate son who couldn't inherit the Barony.
- Francis ffarington Gardner (1772–1821)
- Stewart William Gardner (1812–1882)
- Alan Hyde Gardner, "4th Baron Gardner" (1836–1899)
- Alan Hyde Gardner, "5th Baron Gardner" (1881–)
- Alan William Gardner, "6th Baron Gardner" (1908–1975)
- Julian James Gardner, "7th Baron Gardner" (1942–)
- (1) Ashley Rodney Gardner (1968–)
- Archibald Horace Gardner (1945–)
- () Adrian Arnold Gardner (1978–)
- Robert Gardner (1916–)
- Edward Zemindar Gardner (1838–1920)
- Charles van Straubanzee Gardner, * 1883, + 1951, Md. 1900, Ellen Gardner, + 1951, d. of William Rickards Gardner.
- Henry Gardner, * 1911, Md. 1941, Emma Gardner, d. of Harry Gardner.
- David Francis Gardner, * 1945.
- Charles Straubanzee Gardner, * 1951.
- Edward Kingston Gardner, * 1917, Md. 1946, Mary Cicolia De Silva, d. of G. A. De Silva.
- Frederick Anthony Gardner, * 1946.
- Terrance Lewis Gardner, * 1952.
- Francis Robert Gardner, * 1920, Md. 1953, Irene Martin.
- George Washington Gardner, * 1954.
- Henry Gardner, * 1911, Md. 1941, Emma Gardner, d. of Harry Gardner.
- Benjamin Gardner, * 1889, + 1937, Md. 1914, Soaphe Sheakoa, + 1936.
- Daniel Gardner, of Aligarh, India, * 1919, Md. 1946, Irene Christicole, d. of R. M. Christicole.
- Noel Gardner, * 1947.
- Ivan Elfin Gardner, * 1950.
- Daniel Gardner, of Aligarh, India, * 1919, Md. 1946, Irene Christicole, d. of R. M. Christicole.
- Charles van Straubanzee Gardner, * 1883, + 1951, Md. 1900, Ellen Gardner, + 1951, d. of William Rickards Gardner.
- Tandy Gardner, * 1846
- William Rickards Gardner, * 1852, + 1915, Md. 1879, ?
- Francis Faringdon Gardner, * 1880, +, Md. 1897, Henrietta Gardner, * 1881, + 1943, d. of Edward Gardner (See Above).
- Wellington Gardner, * 1881.
- Alan Hyde Gardner, * 1900.
- Alan Hyde Gardner (1814–1888)
- Alan Hyde Gardner (1850–1901)
- Alan Hyde Gardner (1878–1949)
- Francis ffarington Gardner (1881–1948)
- Philip Charles Gardner (1883–1932)
- David William Hyde Gardner (1913–)
- () Alan David Hyde Gardner (1939–)
- () Edward Morrice Gardner (1974–)
- () Nicholas George Hyde Gardner (1977–)
- () John Henry Wroth Gardner (1946–)
- () Thomas Edward Wroth Gardner (1974–)
- () Eliott Marrice Gardner (2004–)
- () Oscar Edward Gardner (2009–)
- () Daniel John Wroth Gardner (1975–)
- () William Henry Gardner (1978–)
- () Thomas Edward Wroth Gardner (1974–)
- () William Patrick Hyde Gardner, (1960–)
- () James Francis ffarington Gardner, (1962–)
- () Alan David Hyde Gardner (1939–)
- David William Hyde Gardner (1913–)
- Alan Hyde Gardner (1850–1901)
- Stewart William Gardner (1812–1882)
- William Henry Gardner (1774–1856)
- Henry Cossley, d.1792
- Herbert (29 Aug 1781-10 Aug 1858); m.7 Nov 1804 Mary Anne Cornwall (d.6 Nov 1857)
- Edward (9 Mar 1784- )
- Valentine, d.1786
- Valentine William (1787-d.at Canton Nov 1829)
- Samuel Martin (1789-28 Nov 1851)
Arsenal matches in Europe edit
| List of Wolverhampton Wanderers games in UEFA competitions | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Competition | Round | Opponent | Home | Away | Aggregate | References |
| 1958–59 | European Cup | 1R |  Schalke 04
|
2–2 | 1–2 | 3–4 | [1] |
| 1959–60 | European Cup | PR | Vorwärts Berlin
|
2–0 | 1–2 | 3–2 | [2] |
| R16 |  Red Star Belgrade
|
3–0 | 1–1 | 4–1 | |||
| QF |  Barcelona
|
2–5 | 0–4 | 2–9 |
Draft Arsenal edit
Hereditary Office (s) edit
- Marquess of Ailesbury, Warden of Savernake Forest
- Earl of Annandale and Hartfell, Hereditary Steward of Annandale and Hereditary Keeper of Lochmaben Palace
- Anstruther baronets, Hereditary Master Carver, Royal Household Scotland
- Duke of Argyll, Hereditary Master of the Household of Scotland, Hereditary Castle Dunoon
Up to 271
Married couples in the House of Lords edit
Based on the Life Peerages Act 1958 and Peerage Act 1963.
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
- [[]] and [[]], married in 19
Reference edit
Blocked for sockpuppetry edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:44, 16 July 2021 (UTC)- I've chosen to upgrade to an indefinite full block for the (apparent) evasion. Any admin is free to downgrade this back to a partial block at their discretion without consulting me further. CC Wugapodes as the most recent pblocking admin. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:47, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Mr Hall of England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I found out that I blocked, it wasn't me who did that alleged edit. My main edits are the peerage. I was planning to return to my life peer pages, god willing. Mr Hall of England (talk) 21:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You claimed above that your account was compromised; as such, it will not be unblocked. You also do not address the use of other accounts or editing while logged out. As such, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 06:22, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
While blocked, you may only use this page to request unblock, you may not use it to practice editing or prepare edits(they are still stored in the edit history); it's hard to communicate with you when you load this page down with tables for articles. 331dot (talk) 06:22, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Mr Hall of England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I would like to return to editing as I have been on a low spell and I want to return to what I do best, I feel that I have changed my perspective on editing, I have looked at other editors do well with the Peerage which is good. I would be happy to come back with a moderator, if returned to the fold. Mr Hall of England (talk) 22:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Confirmed block evasion as House of Nobles, as well as logged-out editing. I'm sorry to see this. Yamla (talk) 22:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mr Hall of England (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What do I have to do to come back editing, I want to comeback, House of Nobles is not my account. I miss editing, I don't have much of a life, my mental health is in crisis as I can't edit articles or even my Archive pages, I would like to have some training to come back. Mr Hall of England (talk) 06:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See below. PhilKnight (talk) 08:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
If your mental health is in crisis, please seek help from a qualified professional. Wikipedia is not here to fix your health issues. Even leaving aside the sock puppetry, which is not in doubt, you have said your account was compromised. These are both reasons this account will not be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 08:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Hereditary Peerages created since the Life Peerages Act 1958 edit
Hello, Mr Hall of England. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hereditary Peerages created since the Life Peerages Act 1958, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of List of chancellors of Germany by age for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of chancellors of Germany by age until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Newshunter12 (talk) 22:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- While you didn't create the above article, it is a batch nomination that includes List of presidents of Greece by age, which you did. Newshunter12 (talk) 22:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Nru edit
Template:Nru has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:German politics/party colours/BP edit
Template:German politics/party colours/BP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:German politics/party colours/KPD edit
Template:German politics/party colours/KPD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:German politics/party colours/DP edit
Template:German politics/party colours/DP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Israel FIFA World Cup record edit
Template:Israel FIFA World Cup record has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Heads of State of the Bahamas edit
Template:Heads of State of the Bahamas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Heads of State of Ireland edit
Template:Heads of State of Ireland has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:30, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Hereditary Peerages created since the Life Peerages Act 1958 edit
Hello, Mr Hall of England. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hereditary Peerages created since the Life Peerages Act 1958".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for merger of Template:Presidents of Fiji edit
Template:Presidents of Fiji has been nominated for merging with Template:Heads of state of Fiji. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 14:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Scottish and Irish Peers with Imperial Titles edit
Hello, Mr Hall of England. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scottish and Irish Peers with Imperial Titles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:04, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Scottish and Irish Peers with Imperial Titles edit
Hello, Mr Hall of England. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Scottish and Irish Peers with Imperial Titles".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:50, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Category:BBC Daytime television series has been nominated for renaming edit
Category:BBC Daytime television series has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 05:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
The article 2002 FIFA World Cup qualification – OFC second round has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
All information from this article is already found at 2002 FIFA World Cup qualification (OFC), so no need for a separate article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wburrow (talk) 05:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- ^ "UEFA Champions League 1958–59". RSSSF. Retrieved 4 March 2019.
- ^ "UEFA Champions League 1959–60". RSSSF. Retrieved 4 March 2019.