MrDDG
Your personal experience was erased because it was not verifiable using reliable sources.
Gold Standard 04:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello MrDDG, sorry for that and welcome to Wikipedia. The content was erased due to several reasons; one being that the content you added did not have a reference. The second reason is that you wrote a personal opinion on Wikipedia which compromises the neutrality of Wikipedia. Contributors are always encouraged to remain neutral when writing articles on Wikipedia.
حرر المعرفة (talk) 04:22, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Response to your question at the Teahouse
edit
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by GaramondLethe 17:21, 29 July 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
All that talk about "sharing knowledge" and reducing suffering on Wikipedia,,, is very limited.Thank goodness for Blogs!MrDDG (talk) 20:29, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
- Blogs are fine and certainly have their role, but Wikipedia's role is to report on what reliable sources say on a topic, not to report on editor's personal experiences. If we ran Wikipedia like a blog, then it would be a blog and not the world's greatest encyclopedia. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 00:23, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey
editHello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
Jonathan and Sarah, Teahouse hosts 02:18, 2 October 2012 (UTC)