Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss Hotlegs International (February 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DaxServer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 16:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mosy O'Ginni! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 16:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Mosy O'Ginni. This is your user talk page; the purpose of this page is notification and communication with other Wikipedia editors. It is not a workspace for articles in progress or for self-promotion. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024

edit
 

Hello Mosy O'Ginni. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mosy O'Ginni. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mosy O'Ginni|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

This is regarding Draft:Miss Hotlegs International / Draft:Miss Hotlegs International (2). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I am the client in the context of creating a Wikipedia page for my pageant. I am not being compensated by a person, group, company or organisation to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Mosy O'Ginni (talk) 14:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
You are writing about your business venture, that certainly comes under our paid-editing rules. You need to make a formal disclosure on your user page. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss Hotlegs International (2) (February 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Miss Hotlegs International

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Miss Hotlegs International, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Miss Hotlegs International (2)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Miss Hotlegs International (2), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mosy O'Ginni (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to appeal the indefinite block on my account and the proposed deletion of my Wikipedia page. I understand the importance of Wikipedia's policies against advertising and promotion, and I want to assure you that my page was created with the intention of providing accurate and neutral information about my pageant, rather than for promotional purposes.
My Wikipedia page was created to offer a comprehensive and factual overview of the accomplishments, contributions, and relevant information. It adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines for notability and verifiability, citing reliable sources to support the content provided.
I recognise that there may have been concerns regarding the content of my page, but I assure you that any issues can be addressed through discussion and collaboration. I am committed to working with Wikipedia editors to ensure that the page meets the standards and guidelines set forth by the community.
I kindly request that my account be unblocked and that my Wikipedia page be reinstated. I am willing to make any necessary revisions or improvements to address any concerns raised by the Wikipedia community.
Thank you for considering my appeal, and I hope for a positive resolution to this matter.
Sincerely,
Mosy O'Ginni Mosy O'Ginni (talk) 15:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Chatbot generated requests are not considered. GPTZero score: 98%. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.