Mosquitozzz

Welcome!

Hello, Mosquitozzz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jytdog (talk) 20:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Working in Wikipedia

Wikipedia is "the encyclopedia that anyone can edit", but editing Wikipedia is a privilege, not a right. Editing privilges can be, and are, taken away in whole or in part, for defined periods and indefinitely, when people come to Wikipedia who refuse to engage with the "policies and guidelines" that govern the editing community here.

These policies and guidelines were put in place by the editing community itself, and are what has enabled this whole project to be built, and to be maintained.

You are obviously passionate about AfD. Passion is great as it drives people to contribute, but it is a double-edged sword in that people can be so emotional that they ignore that Wikipedia is not a "wild west" and they are too impatient to stop and learn.

There is nothing new under the sun here - you are not the first impassioned person to show up in Wikipedia, and you will not be the last.

You will either slow down, and learn how this place works, or one of two things will happen -- you will leave angry and never come back and will complain about how "unfair" Wikipedia is, or you will end up losing editing privileges. That is not a "threat", it is just what happens. I have seen it hundreds of times.

Please read WP:ADVOCACY and WP:SPA, which you might find helpful. Please do read WP:TPG and the links in the welcome message above. I have also created a kind of one-page guide at User:Jytdog/How that you might find helpful.

And yes, RTFM applies in Wikipedia. You have an obligation to learn and follow the policies and guidelines here. That is the "price" of your editing privileges. Mine too. Jytdog (talk) 20:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Abuse of talk page as a forum (see WP:NOTFORUM)

• Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article based on reliable sources and the policies and guidelines; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 20:59, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

• Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog (talk) 21:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Mosquito writting Have u red what i have written about main issue on word "populism/ist"?

Plz think about it, the word is doublemeaning, with negative humiliating meaning IN MAJOR. It is not proper to describe perty or commonwelth or people. It is like idiot or dumb words - it has 1 normal and other insulting meaning, and insulting meaning is in MAJOR..

Plz, remove that unproper word from ANY right or leftliberal party description, or change it with another 1 neutral (like advocating, representing, inclining, ...)Mosquitozzz (talk) 21:10, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Alternative for Germany ("populism/ist" termin). (redoubling it on my page, cause they closing and removing my reasonable facting writings (unprejudiced wikipedia moderators?..))

Why u didnt accept and reverted my edit, which was in removing leftliberal propaganda slogan "populist" from AFD description? I bet that u will remove immediately "populist" addition to CDU/CSU and SPD description in same manner.. when they do populists talk and actions, so they also easily can be called populists, as, actually, most of politic parties and so on. But u place that "populist" slogan only to rightwing parties... ..................

Term is obuse & propaganda 4m leftliberals to haul down their opponents..

It is same as u write in description of CDU/CSU and SPD word liers or demagogues (do u understand what picture already is created.. demagoguers, unrealistic proposals..).. "CDU/CSU and SPD are leftlibheral demagog parties... CDU/CSU and SPD are populists parties..." That termin is offend and propaganda from 1 side to bite and insult other side. It is insult, and u understand that, and that insult, as u clearly can see if u walk around sphere of politics, is directed always only to right parties, when leftliberal parties depicted as "puffy and pure and angels".. and all insult words are removing from their descriptions immediately.. That is not how wikipedia should work.. It is not right to do offending propaganda and insult against 1s, while whitewash others...

Yes, word "populist" has some meanings, but most major of those are insulting 1, it mean like emptymeaning talker, tub-thumper, ranter, like emptywords without deads talker. It is insult. Only to rightwings..

"Reliable sources", who used that insulting termin usually are leftliberals or their mass media... who specially call rightwings or other their opponents with those words, u should understand that. Leftliberals has much more money then conservators and rights, so those leftliberals own a lot of "reliable sources" ..it is politic. About that termin "populist" we should go to it basic definition:

"Political parties and politicians often use the terms populist and populism as pejoratives against their opponents. Such a view sees populism as demagogy, merely appearing to empathize with the public through rhetoric or unrealistic proposals in order to increase appeal across the political spectrum.[2]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populism

Do u understand? So that termin to AFD is Pejorative. Specially. By their opponents on the ground of politics.

If u want to do some addition to wikipedia name of righwing party, u can call them for example neutral not offending word like "rightwing advocating party", "rightwing representing party", "rightwing inclining party" or another neutral not insulting word, but i think it is no need, it as already understood what is rightwing. And in German version it called just rightwing party.

If reliable sources (mass media in internet or other media so on) owned by rightwings, will call some leftliberal party "lier" (cause they catched them lying on some issues, 4 example), then u also would write in description of that leftliberal party word "liberal lier party"???

What sources u mean??? THAT IS POLITIC. We should place our ground NOT on politic sources, but on main LINGUISTIC definition of the word, and 1 of MAJOR definition of the word "populist" is insulting pejorative 1.

"Political parties and politicians often use the terms populist and populism as pejoratives against their opponents. Such a view sees populism as demagogy, merely appearing to empathize with the public through rhetoric or unrealistic proposals in order to increase appeal across the political spectrum." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populism

NOW U WANT TO SHUT me down because of MY NORMAL CONVERSATION WITH U BY HIDING ON "reliable resources" ground? Reliable resources in that case is definition vocabulary, and that vocabulary says that 1 of meaning of "populist" is like i have written above. Insulting 1. It is like Dumb or Idiot word - it has 1 normal meaning, and other insulting 1, and insulting 1 is used more often.

I AM NORMALLY INTELLIGENTICALLY(RESPECTFULLY) do CONVERSATION WITH U providing logic statements and facts. But u threat to delete me.. nice.. nice position..

On populism termin we should go on LINGUISTIC SIDE HERE. ON LINGUISTIC. AND LINGUISTIC, different dictionaries, vocabularies DIFFERENT A LOT OF 1S, u can see it in inet, on paper so on THEY SAY STRICTLY - 1 OF MEANING OF "POPULISM, POPULIST" IS INSULTING, PREJUDICE 1, 1 that want to show some1 as emptytalker, unrealistic proposators, so on in that line. THAT WORD SHOULd NOT BE USED AS DESCRIPTION OF parties of people, it is double meaning word, with bad insulting meaning in MAJOR.

AND WHAT U DOING? U SHUTTING ME DOWN FOR LOGIC AND FACTING WRITINGS? THAT IS NOTHING ELSE as repression on unwished respectful logical factized talkers, that is 3d reich, USSR and North KOREA totalitarism, and other such their ways of doing.. That is wikipedia? that is free commonwealth place to not propaganding but write respectfully, not insulting and unPredisitivenessly???

Lol, write then directly in description, that AFD is demagog, emptytalker, unrealistic proposal party.. lol. WHY U DONT WRITE THAT "POPULIST" TERMIN ABOUT LEFTLIBERAL PARTIES, HU??? WHY ONLY RIGHTWINGS 1S??? WHAT IS YOUR WIKI? LEFTLIBERALS PROPAGANDA PLACE TO HUMILIATE RIGHTIES AND CONSERVATIVES??

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/populism political ideas and activities that are intended to get the support of ordinary people by giving them what they want: Their ideas are simple populism - tax cuts and higher wages. Thesaurus: synonyms and related words http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/populist representing or relating to the ideas and opinions of ordinary people: a populist manifesto a populist leader "Political parties and politicians often use the terms populist and populism as pejoratives against their opponents. Such a view sees populism as demagogy, merely appearing to empathize with the public through rhetoric or unrealistic proposals in order to increase appeal across the political spectrum." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populism Addition to that, 1 of meaning is "mean support of ordinary people by giving them what they want" - ordinary people are different, 7 000 000 000 of people we have there, many of them do not want what propose AFD or other rightwings, not mention that how u would know who is ordinary voter who is not? and which voter to which class is related so on.., so again, that word can not be used to rightwings or to leftliberals parties and peoples on such place as wikipedia. 1 of major mean of "Populist" word is insulting, offending, propaganda meaning.

Word "populism/ist" should be removed from AFD as from any other party description as doublemeaning, with negative meaning in MAJOR.

Not Mosquto writting: Hi Mosquitozzz. I too am concerned about leftist bias on Wikipedia, and the use of incendiary language and weasel words as a result of the uncritical acceptance of mainstream media outlets (which are biased in their own right). Take this from someone who sympathizes -- you are approaching this the wrong way. You must familiarize yourself with the policies and guidelines, because everyone has to work within them. Using Wiki as a soapbox, or using diatribes as a means of brute-forcing your views, will never work and will only lead to blocks/bans. What you have to do is work WITHIN the system to correct any faults you see. As an aside, why do you object to the term 'populism'? Right-wing populism is an acceptable term for Trump, Brexit, AfD, etc., just as Bernie Sanders, Melenchon, and Podemos are left-wing populist. The real pejoratives IMO are 'nazi' 'fascist' 'white supremacist' etc. Xcalibur (talk) 01:55, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Mosquito writing: Because it is same as u write in description of some1, 4 example, like that 1 is retarded, dumb person. Those (and some other)words has 2 main meaning, but negative 1 is used more often and is major to other. That is why. Same with "populist". To be good reasonable here, i have to place a lot of official meaning of that word from vocabularies and dictionaries, to proof myself, i just don't want to do that JOB now, i ve my life too. But if u know at least a little English, u understand i am right about doublemeaning of "populist" word with NEGATIVE MEANING IN MAIN (IN CHIEF, IN MAJOR).

I am not talking about AFD here, i am talking about removal of that insult and offend from every party description, be there right or left or other 1, or vice versa, if u use it on about 1 party, same u should use on all other, cause they all populists. BUT WIKI DO IT SELECTIVE.. ONLY MOSTLY ABOUT RIGHT WING AND CONSERVATIVE PARTIES and politics... Why? Uh? Dont u think that? ... And what they do to that reasonable question and ask - THEY SHUT U DOWN... I think we have problems with moderators of wiki.. some of them seem to be not unPredisitivenessly, not unprejudiced..Mosquitozzz (talk) 02:58, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Not Mosquto writting: Yes, I too have observed selectiveness and bias on Wiki. However, I would argue that 'populism' is a descriptive term, rather than a pejorative (which is borne out by the dictionary links you posted). The fact that right-wing populism is more frequently labelled as such may have to do with its greater prominence compared with left-wing populism. Perhaps you should seek to redress this by pointing out that Sanders, Melenchon, Podemos etc. are under the left-wing populist banner, so that all movements are represented fairly. That would be a better solution than trying to censor the term 'populism', a non-controversial word that accurately describes these movements without any value judgments. Xcalibur (talk) 04:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Conversation is not over

Hi. Per WP:OWNTALK, Jytdog‎ can remove comments from his talk page if he wants to. Assume that he doesn't want to talk to you anymore. You can stop haranguing him. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Mosquito writing: And are u his secretar speaker to deliver me that message?

Guys, Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, which is based under reasonable grounds, truth, science facts so on. Without insulting and propaganda and so on.

Term "populist" .. write above i have written about that. it is not right term to be used to describe parties and politics, cause it is same as describe person who usually do not do much sound as DUMB person.. and other such doublemeaning words, where negative meaning is in major(in chief). Should be changed on another more 1meaning word, more proper, less insulting. Or be removed at all, it is at al clear what rightwing party or leftwing party are, no need to place there word "populists", "advocating" "representing", it is only doublemean and grammatically unnecessary burden.Mosquitozzz (talk) 03:10, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

June 2018

Hello, I'm Calton. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lana Lokteff have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Calton | Talk 01:47, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

It's wp:reliably sourced, very well sourced, as "fake news". There has been considerable discussion on talk:Alex Jones and get wp:consensus before removal.
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Alex Jones. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 04:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert for American politics post 1932

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Doug Weller talk 11:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Alex Jones, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Your edit summary was incredibly inappropriate and comments like those will not be tolerated on Wikipedia. Also, you need consensus for that change you'd like made -- consensus you do not have. Gain consensus on the talk page, then make that change. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 05:48, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Mosquitozzz. You have new messages at MelbourneStar's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I and edited politely content, as u saw. They write about him lye and bad things. Other my non content text, which is shown only for moderators, was for leftist and leftliberals, who write leftists/leftliberals fakes and bad things, when for same deads, but for left/leftliberals they do not write. It is total left campaign against rights from everywhere, especially from google, wiki and other main sources.

WP:NOTHERE and WP:BATTLE seem to apply here. Topic ban or block? -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 06:23, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lana Lokteff, you may be blocked from editing. Calton | Talk 06:25, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Globular Amphora culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ukrainian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)