Mosi Nuru

Hi, this is my talk page.

Warning about stalking

Following an editor to an article you have never edited before because of a disagreement on another article is considered hounding which is considered a form of wikiharassment and is actionable by admins. You have now changed (at least) 2 articles which you have never edited before simply because of our disagreement on Project 2025. If you continue to do this, it may result in a report for violating our policies which prohibit such conduct, linked above. Thanks. Skyerise (talk) 20:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

This is the second time you have accused me of improper conduct (lack of civility, now harassment).

In both cases I believe your accusation is baseless and made in bad faith. Mosi Nuru (talk) 20:26, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Try me. You are in the wrong here. Skyerise (talk) 20:28, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

"Try me." You sound threatening. I would like you to please contact the admins. Mosi Nuru (talk) 20:37, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Don't worry. I will. But not at your demand. Skyerise (talk) 20:38, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

@Daniel Quinlan, Tassedethe, GiantSnowman, and @OverlordQ: you are the top four listed recently active admins--would you be willing to weigh in?

Here is my version of events (if Skyerise disagrees, I welcome input).

1. I visited the page for Project 2025, and noticed that the see also section included a link to Liber OZ. I found this inappropriate, and deleted.

2. Skyerise reverted my edit.

3. I created a talk subject on the page. Another user deleted Liber OZ as well. Skyerise reverted that user's edit too.

4. Later, Skyerise acknowledged that a consensus had been met, and deleted the link.

5. In the process, I noticed that Skyerise had made the same "see also" link to Liber OZ in Tyrannicide and human rights inflation. I believed that these were similarly inappropriate, pointed to the consensus from Project 2025 and deleted. I also noticed several parts of the Liber OZ article that could be improved, and made edits. Skyerise has reverted most of these edits.

6. Skyerise has accused me of incivility and harassment. I believe this is wrong, and that Skyerise is himself behaving in an uncivil and threatening manner to me (see my talk page, and our discussions on the talk pages of Liber OZ and Project 2025), and is reverting my edits in violation of "revert only when necessary" and "encourage the newcomers."

I would appreciate input. Thanks! Mosi Nuru (talk) 20:55, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Please read WP:BRD. Admins, please see the talk page where this editor called me "obsessive" - a clear personal attack, in which they mentioned an article I had been working on. Then, they go to that article and essentially defaced it without any discussion on the talk page. I reverted it per WP:BRD and asked that they demonstrate consensus for their change, as required by WP:BRD. Instead, they defaced it even more. There are specific reasons why the specific headings are used in that article, as explained on the talk page, but it seems the intent is not to improve the article, but rather to hound me. That's not right. Skyerise (talk) 21:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Oh, and you're misgendering me. Skyerise (talk) 21:15, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Your recent editing history at Liber OZ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skyerise (talk) 20:38, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 21:12, 17 July 2024 (UTC)