Help me!

edit

Please help me with... getting Robert Edward Gurney page live on Wikipedia. I have finished it.

Morriston (talk) 11:01, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

I have moved the draft back to Draft:Robert Edward Gurney; please don't put it into project space ("Wikipedia:...") again, it is not a project page. You can submit it for review by adding the code {{subst:submit}} to the top of the page, but in its present state it will be rejected for insufficient demonstration of notability and lack of sources, not to mention excessive trivia and non-encyclopedic language. The lead section (above the table of contents) is pretty much okay, or would be if it were sourced; the rest simply doesn't belong on Wikipedia in any form. I would encourage you to read Your first article and rewrite the whole thing in line with Wikipedia's standards. Yunshui  13:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Edward Gurney has been accepted

edit
 
Robert Edward Gurney, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of George Edward Donovan

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on George Edward Donovan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bmj.com/content/286/6378/1658. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:07, 26 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Edward Donovan (February 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lee Vilenski was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 13:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Morriston! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 13:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Edward Donovan (February 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:38, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Edward Donovan (March 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thsmi002 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thsmi002 (talk) 16:31, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply