CS1 error on Qatar edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Qatar, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:24, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

January 2024 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Qatar–United States relations, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. John Yunshire (talk) 14:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay. Thank you. Was just trying to add a constructive section to the page. Will keep your points in consideration. Morgan1811 (talk) 05:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Your edit to Qatar Airways has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Jetstreamer Talk 12:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tourism in Europe edit

Hi. I moved your article, Tourism in Europe, to Draft space, for good reason: unclear, lack of references, and largely outdated. You have moved it back to article space yourself. This is generally not a good idea, especially when no improvements were made. Requests for citations and clarifications have now been added; I've marked it as needing updates. And a section saying "See results below" with no results below has been removed. I will be requesting that it's moved back to Draft space. I would strongly recommend that you don't move it back to article space yourself, but instead use the Articles for Creation approval process. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 12:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deceptive edit summaries edit

Hello Morgan1811: I reverted your edits to Sheikh Eid bin Mohammad Al Thani Charitable Association, which were unexplained content removals. The summaries appeared to be deceptive, since they were describing small uncontroversial additions, but you also removed unrelated content in the same edits [1][2]. Please, stop doing this. MarioGom (talk) 17:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024 edit

  Your edit to Ireland–United Kingdom relations has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. MarioGom (talk) 17:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your suggestion Morgan1811 (talk) 05:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Karen Maron—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:16, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Ibrahim Mahama (businessman), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 07:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Contributor00001 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Contributor00001. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Izno (talk) 01:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I request you to unblock my account as I mentioned in my user page that I am new to Wikipedia and yet exploring the rules and patterns. I guarantee no edits made by me were harming or abusing any account. This is self created account and there is no association with User:Contributor00001.
Kindly consider the request and give another chance to make things right. I assure that will keep in mind all the points mentioned. Morgan1811 (talk) 11:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply