Or view source code of preceding version
Contribution of response options to mitigation, adaptation, combating desertification, and land degradation, and enhancing food security
Magnitude of the contribution of each response option categorized using thresholds as positive or negative impacts [1] with confidence associated with each estimate [2], also showing the cost range [3]
Response option based
on land management | Mitigation | Adaptation | Desertification | Land degradation | Food security
Forest management | ++ (M) | +++ (L) | +++ (L) | +++ (L) | ++ (L)
...............................................................................................................................
Reduced deforestation
and degradation | +++ (M) | ++ (L) | +++ (L) | +++ (L) | + (L)
...............................................................................................................................
Reforestation and
forest restoration | +++ (M) | +++ (M) | +++ (M) | +++ (M) | - - (M)
...............................................................................................................................
Afforestation | +++ (M) | +++ (M) | +++ (M) | +++ (M) | - - - (M)
...............................................................................................................................
Bioenergy and BECCS | +++ (M) | - (L) | - - (M) | - - - (M) | - - - (M)
(Image was cut here)
Notes: [1] originally displayed in different intensities of blue for magnitude of positive impact respective red for magnitude of negative impact, here displayed with + and -
[2] low (L), medium (M), high (H)
[3] not reproduced here