Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 05:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Moonythesock! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 05:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Moonythesock/sandbox

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Moonythesock/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Eagleash (talk) 05:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Eagleash, Someone took the april fools joke too seriously. It was tagged with [April Fools!]. But if it was a real spam page this would've been the 100% appropriate response! —moonythepotato (Braden N.) 15:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
I think I shouldn't have used GPT-2 to write it, it was too good at it's job. —moonythepotato (Braden N.) 15:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:AfC pending submissions by age/1 day's time has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:AfC pending submissions by age/1 day's time has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:AfC pending submissions by age/2 days' time has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:AfC pending submissions by age/2 days' time has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply