User talk:Moonythedwarf/Archives/2020/November

Latest comment: 3 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 29 November 2020

Administrators' newsletter – November 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

16:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Trouted

 

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE RJHeron (talk) 03:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

RJHeron, Ow.
WP:TROUT explains them. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 04:35, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

...I'm learning talk stuff and I wanted to know what Trout did... still don't know. (But if you're a fiherman you know trouts are all good) Thanks for your recent advice! RJHeron (talk) 03:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of Yankee Cruising Club page (draft)

I received a message that this article may be unpublished because of a possible conflict of interest. I am a member of this organization but I have made an effort to avoid "sales" or "marketing" terminology.

While I am a member, I have read the guidelines and I'm not sure why this would be an issue. This is a not-for-profit and not a commercial organization and I do not benefit personally from this listing. I added the article to let others know of the organizations existence as I believe it to be a service to the community. Can you please clarify the issues that I need to address?

Additional Question - I am new to wikipedia, I added this content to the associated talk page but am also posting it here. What is the best way to communicate with you/wiki editors. Should I delete these messages once the issues have been resolved?

Thanks for your help Petersboston (talk) 20:39, 6 November 2020 (UTC)Petersboston (talk) 20:34, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Petersboston, Do not delete messages that have been responded to. Anyway, as for your question:
Wikipedia depends strongly on a neutral point of view, which is why the stuff for COI editors exists, and why, no matter what the organization's purpose or goal, a COI is important for the user to note. For example pretty much every active editor here counts as having a COI for the Wikipedia page (which is actually one of the longest pages on the site... not very surprising)
There's nothing particularly wrong with the draft, but be careful about promotional language, weasel words, and puffery. Also keep in mind and double check that the organization is notable, or you'll be met with disappointment when you try and submit it and it's declined for failing WP:GNG or WP:NORG. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 20:44, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the help. To clarify, is 'We strive to be...' one of the phrases that is considered Puffery? Was that one of the issues?
This is also still a work in progress and I hope to add additional info, perhaps it should have been created in my Sandbox first until I think it is ready for your review.
Also, I included links to outside publications as 'proof' of notability, is that the type of info that you look for?
Last question, is this an instance where I might use "edit request" Is that how I would ask for someone like yourself to look at the listing and make suggestions or is it a general request to all Wiki users? Would I just put that markup at the top of the page?
Thanks again for the help Petersboston (talk) 21:09, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Petersboston, Read our info on reliable sources, and the general notability guidelines, for what counts as a good source for notability.
Wikipedia isn't a listing for what an organization wants to say about itself, think of wikipedia as a neutral third party writing about that organization. That's why "we strive to be" is not ok, but things like "x strives to do y" does usually fall under puffery. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 21:14, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Petersboston, Also, yes, the edit request system is probably fine. Just put it at the top of the page. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 21:16, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, that helps. I'm still figuring all of this stuff out, as you can guess by my multiple edits fixing the indentation :)
Petersboston (talk) 21:19, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

RfC about items in school lists

Hi there. There's currently an RfC at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools about if only notable/referenced schools should be included in lists or not. I told the person who started it that you had removed non-notable entries from List of schools in Zimbabwe in the hope that maybe he would ask your opinion, but it appears that he decided not to. In case you feel like participating though, the more people that do the better. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

15:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

look at this silly little cat!

 

thank you for being so welcoming! :p


LuminousMario (talk) 16:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Unexplained mass deletion of material from Talk:Shimer College

Why did you delete a large amount of material from Talk:Shimer College without a cogent explanation or discussion? ElKevbo (talk) 12:49, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

ElKevbo, All IABot, which previously had an RFC ran about safe deletion of it's messages. I assumed deleting it's messages was fine. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 12:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Got it. Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 13:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

He is sockpuppet see above,Shadow4dark (talk) 18:39, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Shadow4dark, Fix your link? Dead. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 18:41, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm just going to summon someone more experienced to review this weirdness. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 18:41, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Compare his edit summaries with his blocked socks in Gulen movement page. Shadow4dark (talk) 18:48, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Shadow4dark I think you may be suffering from autism. I have absolute no connection to those sock puppets. Anyone can make similar arguments at a time. CheeringDesert (talk) 18:55, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
CheeringDesert, WP:NPA. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 18:56, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Diagnosing someone with a health disorder is not a personal attack boss. CheeringDesert (talk) 18:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
CheeringDesert, You and I both know your intent with that statement. If you wish to make that argument again you can get off my talk page. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 18:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
I think you're right. I got too ahead of myself for receiving false warnings and should not have typed that message. For this reason I am voluntarily retiring from Wikipedia! So long! CheeringDesert (talk) 19:09, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Alright, bye. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 19:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Point in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt

I just came across your deletion nomination, and you claim "Editor lies in their restore edit, check the original draft, it's not a translation". Are you sure about this? The corresponding article in German Wikipedia has been around for a long time, and it seems to be a translation (even if you can't read German, going off non-linguistic clues like numbers, pictures, and structure). Saying that another editor is lying is a serious allegation; is there something I'm missing here? Vahurzpu (talk) 04:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Vahurzpu, I cannot read german, I should've phrased that better to note that it seems like it's not a direct translation in my eyes.
I could also just be stupid, so I'll be retracting that claim. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 15:14, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
In fact, I really shouldn't have been editing yesterday as I hadn't slept the night before (don't ask) and my judgement would likely be poor.
I'll retract the AfD, liberally apply a trout, and enjoy my weekend. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 15:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

 

This kitten concurs with your graceful handling of the TH Ingolstadt AfD. :)

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

15:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For standing up against long-time trolls, and against harassment. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Move draft to article "List of nonlinear video games"

Hi. I'm new here, can you move the draftspace to article in this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:List_of_nonlinear_video_games I just wanted to add some games with nonlinear narratives/gameplay.Moonwriter Theory (talk) 14:00, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

HI Moonythedwarf/Archives/2020/November,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

17:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Suspecting COI & undisclosed PAID

Hi, Moonythedwarf, thank you for your reply at Oshwah's talk page (here: Special:PermaLink/989742250#Suspecting COI & undisclosed PAID, how to proceed?).

The story began at WP:HELPDESK with this talk thread Special:PermanentLink/989746080#recover user name by IP user 74.87.126.98 (talk · contribs · WHOIS).

As you can see from their contributions, soon after the talk they edited pages The Naturist Society and Nude & Natural, which are within a scope of interest revealed in the WP:HD talk. The following day the IP user stopped editing and a new account CaretakerofN (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (plus contribs at Commons) has been created to take over the task.

The CaretakerofN account name certainly could be chosen by some unconnected enthusiast of nudity and the society of naturists, but I hope you'll agree the coincidence in time is unbelievable. So I suppose the CaretakerofN account belongs to the The Naturist Society and as such it has obvious CoI, probably Paid and almost certainly Shared issues, which should be explained.

However, I do not feel fluent enough in English and in Wikipedia policies to conduct necessary investigation (and I have no access to any tools which may appear necessary during the procedure), hence my question at Oshwah's talkpage. --CiaPan (talk) 23:03, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

CiaPan, I ended up drafting Draft:The Naturist Society again, due to it's severe lack of cites. I'll discuss this with some other editors. Paging Blablubbs. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 16:47, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi CiaPan and Moonythedwarf. My take here is that this seems like a relatively clear-cut case of COI editing. I don't see a case for sockpuppettry because the edits were sequential, not parallel, and the username – while indicative of a COI – is not in violation of our username policy. Since moony has draftified the page (a decision I disagree with since I believe AfD would've been a better option here), and given the user a {{uw-paid1}} alert, I think there's little left to do for now. If the user doesn't respond to the warning (or makes promotional edits), the warnings should be escalated and the user eventually reported to COIN – but for now, I'd just wait and observe. I hope this helps. Best, Blablubbs (talkcontribs) 17:04, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Thank you both, Moonythedwarf and Blablubbs for taking appropriate steps.   Keep healthy – and happy editing! --CiaPan (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

I have told you that I am a volunteer naturist and I am not being paid by The Naturist Society. Who do I talk to about putting the draft: The Naturist Society back out again? I have read the guidelines and it says that anyone can edit articles. I have not violated any copyrights. If you not not approve of my edits then remove then and put the draft as you call it back and leave it at that. CaretakerofN (talk) 19:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

CaretakerofN, Improve upon the draft and put it through WP:AFC. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 19:10, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

 

Here's a gift for you!

Moonlight Kitty (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020