Monday0601
September 2009 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Barn Swallow has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. December21st2012Freak , (The world will end in 2012...) 19:07, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Re: September 2009 edit
Are you out of your mind? How would adding an audio file of the birds that users are reading about so they could not only see but hear be nonconstructive? Monday0601 (talk) 19:19, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
- I have reverted part of your edits - please do not mess up existing formatting of references unless there is a good reason to do so. I ahve left the audio recording for the moment until I can find out why it was removed. Sabine's Sunbird talk 19:35, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
- The references where encoded in the text so that they appear in the correct place in the end with internal links to help you link a fact to a references (inline). Simply listing them at the end does not do this, and having static numbers at the end also gets messed up if someone adds or removes another ref. I moved the references back into the text so that the formatting works. As for moving the box with sounds - behaviour is the usual place to put bird calls as they are an aspect of that. Cheers. Sabine's Sunbird talk 20:24, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing that out. I resorted to contacting the uploader/creator and he is fine with it.Monday0601 (talk) 16:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
License edit
Sampling Plus is not considered a free license. Please see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive_17#Sampling_plus_license Shyamal (talk) 01:45, 4 September 2009 (UTC)