Welcome! edit

Hello, Monaguptadimts, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome.  Adakiko (talk) 08:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System edit

If you remove content, especially citations, please leave a valid reason in the wp:edit summary. Content should have an encyclopedic wp:tone and not sound or be promotional. Per Wikipedia's policy of wp:verifiability, content should cite a wp:reliable source. See wp:citing sources. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 08:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Cjse23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cjse23 (talk) 09:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear Cjes,
I made necessary changes, please allow me to add .
Thanks Monaguptadimts (talk) 06:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


  Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System, you may be blocked from editing. Cjse23 (talk) 07:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System. Materialscientist (talk) 07:53, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest notice edit

  Hello, Monaguptadimts. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 18:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring notice edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 18:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring notice board edit

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Monaguptadimts reported by User:Adakiko (Result: ). Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:20, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring, as you did at Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Aoidh (talk) 10:29, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

When you edit edit

Per wp:verifiability, content needs to cite a wp:reliable source (RS). See wp:citing sources. Your own knowledge is considered wp:OR and is not RS.
When you remove content, especially citations, you should leave an wp:edit summary (ES) that gives a valid reason for removal. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 18:10, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply