Welcome!

Hello, Mnpie1789! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 22:48, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

December 2016 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bobby Beausoleil has been reverted.
Your edit here to Bobby Beausoleil was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/notes/bobby-beausoleil/bobby-beausoleil-life-after-death-row-making-art-and-music-behind-bars-by-adam-k/1156089997739978) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Bobby Beausoleil edit

 

Your recent editing history at Bobby Beausoleil shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ghmyrtle (talk) 18:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Ghmyrtle (talk) 18:59, 22 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Bobby Beausoleil. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I am aware of who Bobby Beausoleil is, primarily through his tangential relationship with Jimmy Page and Boleskine House via Kenneth Anger, but essentially everybody else agrees his murder conviction is the most important and widely documented part of his life and must be mentioned to ensure the encyclopedia is neutral and balanced. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bobby Beausoleil, you may be blocked from editing. Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Block edit

You've been blocked for one week for continuing to edit war, even after your first block for the same offense. El_C 00:00, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Mnpie1789. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 17:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Deb (talk) Thanks Deb. I am currently fixing the article so it doesn't have a narrative style or look like I am promoting Nina Antonia. I don't have an external relationship with the her. My apologies for making it look that way. I'm definitely still in the learning process on the numerous and complicated rules that exist with Wikipedia. Mnpie1789 (talk) 16:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps you should practise by just improving other articles rather than diving straight into creating a new one. Deb (talk) 16:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC) Sorry, my mistake, I just realised you didn't create it! Deb (talk) 16:32, 3 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

I didn't create that article. It was created years before I ever edited it...but thanks for the advice and have a wonderful day Mnpie1789 (talk) 16:33, 3 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I didn't see your apology! No worries. :)Mnpie1789 (talk) 16:34, 3 July 2019 (UTC)Reply