Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  11:08, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! CharlieEchoTango (contact) 04:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Ade Olufeko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

πr2 (tc) 06:25, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Visual Collaborative

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Visual Collaborative, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Ade Olufeko. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:29, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

December 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ade Olufeko, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Possibly unfree File:Alberto Hernandez concept car design.jpg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alberto Hernandez concept car design.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Two images

edit

I notice that File:Alberto Hernandez concept car design.jpg is similar to but not exactly the same as File:Visual Collaborative.jpg. I processed a copyright permission for the former. Does it make sense to delete the latter, as I see no need for two, almost identical images of the same subject?--SPhilbrick(Talk) 12:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your request at Commons OTRS noticeboard was moved to Wikipedia:OTRS noticeboard. I've commented there.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 12:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Visual Collaborative.jpg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Visual Collaborative.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:11, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Advice

edit

Please read Wikipedia:Notability, Wikipedia:Verifiability, and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Deb (talk) 19:07, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Redesigned Visual Collaborative Corp Synergy Logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Redesigned Visual Collaborative Corp Synergy Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with Adé Olufeko

edit

Thanks for reviewing the Aricle, there were two reasons for earlier consensus to mere the article with Visual Collaborative

  1. Most of the References were citing Visual Collaborative (An Institute Founded by Adé Olufeko in 2006)
  2. There were not much independent references citing the contents of Adé Olufeko independently

Two major Changes been made

  1. Name of the Article corrected from "Ade Olufeko" to "Adé Olufeko"
  2. Independent References added (Earlier there were only 5) to support the subject, and to meet the "Notability" guideline

It would be a great help if you review the Article again, and review the merger of a "Living Biography" with an "Institute". Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usatechnologist (talkcontribs) 22:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) Usatechnologist, merger proposals are subject to a community discussion that runs for at least a week, possibly longer if no consensus has been reached by then. In the end, an uninvolved editor (one who has not participated) will assess the consensus and close the discussion. You are welcome to participate in the discussion (in fact you already did so), but it will not be cut short. Huon (talk) 00:15, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Mnanonymous. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Mnanonymous. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply