Welcome

edit

Hello, Mizzystyliston, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 09:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Thomas White (October 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:00, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mizzystyliston! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:00, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Thomas White (October 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Thomas White has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Thomas White. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Thomas White (October 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:27, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Thomas White (October 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lazy Maniik was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
---✨LazyManiik✨ 12:51, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Thomas White (October 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Can you help me out he doesn't have so much info to write bout him he needs for verification and record deals Mizzystyliston (talk) 06:05, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia has no interest in his verification or record deals. Wikipedia is not about making someone notable or gaining them any kind of recognition. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with articles about already notable topics. This means it is a lagging factor on notability. We require our articles to be based on independent published reliable sources. We don't care what the subject says about themselves nor their PR team or anyone connected to the subject. If no one outside their industry has noticed them then they probably aren't notable enough for an article on Wikipedia and no amount of editing can change that. Please take a look through WP:COI, as your message above seems to indicate you do have a conflict of interest in this matter, and WP:YFA. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:29, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply