Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Internet Channel. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --wL<speak·check·chill> 09:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I dont fall into any of those catagories. It's not my site. There is no product on the website to promote. It's free.

Your creation of Wii Porn edit

A tag has been placed on Wii Porn, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NipokNek 09:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply



Isabella dior edit

A tag has been placed on Isabella dior, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 06:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your recent talk page edits edit

Please review the Wikipedia talk page guidelines, and sign your talk page posts using the signature button at the top of the editing window or by using '~~~~' at the end of your post. Michaelbusch 07:45, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

November 2007 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kreia, you will be blocked from editing. TeaDrinker 08:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

May 2008 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. jonny-mt 08:22, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I didn't add any promotional material. YouPorn.com and porntube.com have articles on wiki. Whats the difference between that and pspsex.net?

  • You need to show that this site is notable per WP:WEB, and to support your claim with reliable independent sources per WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Its another video site like the ones listed here. What makes each of those notabable and not this one? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_services They each use the same wiki template too including the one on pspsex.net Stop vandalizing or I will report you. PSPSEX.net has a higher alexa rating than most of them on the list. Its notable. use your brain.

Speedy deletion of PSPSEX edit

 

A tag has been placed on PSPSEX requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ju66l3r (talk) 18:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Image:Rebhot.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on Image:Rebhot.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Rebhot.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. OsamaK 08:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Motion4.jpg listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Motion4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:13, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply