Please feel free to add your comments here !

Mohsen Sazegara edit

Hey, I noticed you had done some work on the article on Mohsen Sazegara. I stumbled across it and gave it a thorough rewrite, and was hoping you could take a look at the article. Iran is not my area of expertise, and I'm hoping to get some feedback on the work I did to the article. Thanks. Pepsi2786 11:11, 11 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Article 4 edit

"There is no need that the decisions be in the framework of Islam," is against Article 4 & 177 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

I wasn't the one who added sharia; my reversion brought it back.--Patchouli 02:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes. There are many contradictory issues in Iranian constitution. Sharia is a a set of fixed Islamic rule mainly in use in sunni countries. While in Iran, clerics believe that they are representative of the prophet. Therefore "what they say is Islam". Therefore we have Expediency Discernment Council. When parliament say A and Guardian council says A is against Islam, then Expediency Council may confirm parliament's decision. That's why Iran is not governed by Sharia as known in most Muslim countries. Mitso Bel 08:58, 22 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Expediency Council is in charge of mediation, not arbitration that would trample upon Islam.--Patchouli 13:38, 24 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • Also, Iranian law is firmly based on Sharia[1].--Patchouli 13:43, 24 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Expediency Council is not independent. Its members are selected by the Supreme Leader & some of its members (Jannati, Rezvani, etc.) are in the GC, too.--Patchouli 13:54, 24 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Furthermore, the EC is SL's cabinet, his advisors. The President of Iran is a joker: " the Supreme Leader has some control over appointments to the more sensitive ministries[2]. It has become Common knowledge that Iran is no republic.http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article1148 --Patchouli 14:01, 24 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Give an example.--Patchouli 14:08, 24 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


Religion in Iran has become devoid of ethics. The mullahs know it, too. However, they won't give up the power, position, and salary.--Patchouli 14:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Apparently, EC is more liberal than GC. I saw the foreign investment and trade agreement examples. However, I was more interesting in seeing EC contradict a clear-cut stance of mullahs such as making veils for women optional.

By the way, I was born in Iran and I can speak Farsi at an elementary level — more or less like a child. I also know most of the alphabet. However, I am not able to read a whole paragraph.

Thanks for the examples.--Patchouli 14:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Comparative literature.jpg) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Comparative literature.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Behnaz Mozakka edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Behnaz Mozakka, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behnaz Mozakka. Thank you. Jayran 17:56, 21 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Rationale for move edit

Can you explain your rationale for moving Jalal al-Din Muhammad Rumi to Jalal ad-Din Muhammad Balkhi-Rumi? In Wikipedia we use the most commonly used name. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 16:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


US raid on Iranian Consulate General in Arbil edit

Just wondering, you are aware that wikipedia is supposed to be neutral, I hardly think U.S. authorities in Iraq would be referred to as "American militants"Rastov 22:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Image source problem with Image:Sales_Moshiri.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Sales_Moshiri.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:11, 9 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 20:11, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:Sales Moshiri.pdf edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Sales Moshiri.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Forouzanfar.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Forouzanfar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

POV editing edit

I'm noticing that your edits are heavily POV, and often done without consensus (such as mergers and re-naming pages). I'm keeping an eye on your edits. Please be careful in the information you put in, and the information you take out. -->David Shankbone 16:31, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

ANI thread about you edit

Just FYI: I reported the POV tag incident and others to the admin noticeboard. -->David Shankbone 17:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Mohammad_Taghi_Bahar.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mohammad_Taghi_Bahar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:53, 29 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 13:53, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Iranian_scientists1.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Iranian_scientists1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 13:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Mitso Bel! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 942 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Akbar Atri - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Farhad Rahbar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ghasem Sholeh-Saadi edit

 

A tag has been placed on Ghasem Sholeh-Saadi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Beeshoney (talk) 21:51, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Nima Youshij.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nima Youshij.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation edit

Your upload of File:Brujerd-Gonabad.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Beyondfitna.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Beyondfitna.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply