Mistermancini

Thomas Salme

Wikipedia takes a very dim view of single-purpose accounts used solely to promote individuals who's only claim to 'fame' is criminal behaviour followed by a court appearance. I suggest you find some other website if you want to act as a shill for this individual, because if you continue in the manner you have, you are liable to find your account blocked. 86.143.229.185 (talk) 05:33, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

And for future reference, I should also point out that Wikipedia also considers the use of multiple accounts for a single purpose to be a violation of policy. Something which you, along with 'Juniorferron', 'Tom Crash' and 'Zabiello' should also bear in mind before adding more unsourced promotional guff about the subject. 86.143.229.185 (talk) 05:41, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Threatening

No multiple use accounts have been used in this article as from my side. Then you are in an aggressive way trying to change the facts. As I have met Mr.Salme and is following his activities I know the facts more then you ar. First of all He absolutely became famous for flying 13 years without a license and he was not charged criminally he was charged more as a fine. So you at wrong. If you as an anonymous user will continue to make changes I will make sure you are blocked. As for Mr.Salme present work, yes he is a photographer and also a documentary film maker so you can not take that away as it is real. I will add references. I believe you have something personally against him then trying to follow the rules of Wikipedia. Mistermancini (talk) 06:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Your use of Wikipedia for promotional purposes has been reported at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

See this thread. [1] And note that editing articles on the behalf of personal acquaintances is also a violation of Wikipedia policy. 86.143.229.185 (talk) 07:29, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:86.143.229.185. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Doug Weller talk 08:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Doug Weller

Doug, I will only make changes on things that are not true or have any facts behind them. The user you mentioned has unfortunate tried to put wrong facts about a living person and I believe that is not good. I hope that you will have a look into the page Thomas Salme and see how it is managed. I will provide more references. Thanks Mistermancini (talk) 08:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mistermancini (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am trying to add facts to a page that has some interest and is a living persons biography. I have been blocked as I have been trying to edit not correct informatin and trying to add both information that is usable for Wikipedia and wit references

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲_水 09:16, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It should be noted that the only reference that Mistermancini added to the article in recent edits was written by Salme himself, and as such not usable under Wikipedia policy. [2] And that the reference didn't support anything of any consequence anyway. 86.143.229.185 (talk) 08:39, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Unblock

The reference was not written by Salme himself. The reference was from: Alidem Gallery, a famous photo gallery in Milan, and from the magazine Lucire Lifestyle magazine a print and digital magazine. More references will be added to make this article more complete. Mistermancini (talk) 08:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

To quote the article directly: "So until the next session from my Miami series, please enjoy those photos I took.—Thomas Salme, with Gretchen Ellis". 86.143.229.185 (talk) 09:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Unblock

well, Salme was quoted but the magazine publishing the article was not Salme. This starts to look like a fake news and I will for sure make a deeper investigation about the way Wikipedia articles are edited. I am for facts and for the truth not for personal feelings. Mistermancini (talk) 14:10, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

You would be well advised to investigate how Wikipedia articles are edited. You can start by looking at the policies on neutrality, and on the requirement that article content be based on published reliable sources, rather than what a contributor thinks is the 'truth'. Particularly when making claims which are demonstrably false. I stated that Salme wrote the article you cited as a reference. You claimed he didn't. He did. Which is the entire truth there. Not that it should matter much, given that the article cited tells us nothing of any consequence about Salme anyway, and accordingly is useless as a source. If he has managed to find honest employment as a fashion photographer, good for him. That isn't however what makes him notable by Wikipedia criteria (if he actually is - there is a discussion currently going on regarding this very question), and accordingly doesn't belong in the article lede. Or in the article body, without evidence that people beyond his clients/employers actually consider his photography of any particular merit. There are thousands of fashion photographers, but few of them merit inclusion in Wikipedia, regardless ow what their friends and acquaintances think. 86.143.229.185 (talk) 16:58, 31 July 2019 (UTC)