MissesKZ
Hey I just reviewed your article! You just need to work on the phrasing of sentences referring to the methodology of the experiments which seem a little bit unclear. Try to expand the article a little further and definitely link it to other Wikipedia articles for it to not be an orphan!. --Jdguevara14 (talk) 23:02, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Welcome! edit
Hello, MissesKZ, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! Sophus Bie (talk) 14:21, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Before I took Comp 2, I used Wikipedia to browse for the broadest source of information on any given topic. If I forgot something as in a date for a certain battle for classes or just wanted to know the main ingredient found in cheese puffs I would turn to Wikipedia. All my school years I had drilled into my head that Wikipedia was not a valid source, and to use it would inflict a deadly plague upon my person, so I never used it academically and instead used to socially and in my private life. It was sad, but that was the case, Comp 2 changed my outlook for sure.
Rebecca has been the most active on her own User page and her sandbox. Seeing this it appears she has been working on getting herself settled as a member of the Wikipedia community but has struggled in doing so with time, making certain the appearance given was a good one. However, as time has gone by there has been a flurry of activity on one specific article, showing a determined work attitude that is blossoming. While she is not ready just yet, there is substantial progress on the Telephone Telepathy article from nothing so as long as she has some guidance she could work very well.
After this class is over with I wish to change my credibility in more of my favor. I still seem to be an infant in that respect so I need to really step up my trail of activity. I need to really contribute to things more, research and help fill out stubs and starts with credible material. I will need to charge forward and be more bold.
Nomination of Telephone telepathy for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Telephone telepathy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telephone telepathy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vzaak (talk) 00:26, 3 September 2013 (UTC)