Welcome!

edit

Hi Mirzahamza091! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 16:57, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tahaffuz Darsgah (August 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 16:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mirzahamza091! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 16:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tahaffuz Darsgah (August 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Saqib were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Dear Saqib,
Thank you for reviewing my submission on Tahaffuz Darsgah. I understand the importance of supporting articles with reliable sources, and I appreciate your feedback. However, I believe the sources I used in the article are reputable and provide comprehensive coverage of the subject. These sources include:
  1. The News International - A major Pakistani newspaper that extensively covered the foundation and inauguration of Tahaffuz Darsgah, including the involvement of UKCAB and Punjab Police.
  2. S&S Today - A reliable online news platform that reported on the opening of the school, detailing its mission and the swift establishment within 18 days.
These sources are well-known and respected in Pakistan, providing thorough coverage of the event and the significance of Tahaffuz Darsgah. I made sure to use in-depth reports from these outlets to ensure the information is verifiable and reliable.
Could you please provide more specific guidance on how I can improve the reliability of the references, or suggest what additional sources might be needed to meet Wikipedia's standards? I am eager to make the necessary adjustments to ensure the article meets Wikipedia’s notability and verifiability requirements.
Thank you for your time and assistance. Mirzahamza091 (talk) 10:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tahaffuz Darsgah (August 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Utopes (talk / cont) 21:53, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply