June 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Elipsos has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Elipsos with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 16:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your username

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Elipsos, and I noticed that your username, "Miquel elipsos", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87". Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a username change that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 16:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

edit

  This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 12:43, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Miquel elipsos. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Elipsos, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 21:18, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm Drm310. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Elipsos, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 21:18, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Elipsos. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Elipsos was changed by Miquel elipsos (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.898624 on 2014-06-26T11:12:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your editing of Elipsos

edit

Hello. There are several issues with your recent editing of the article Elipsos. Please consult the links in blue that I have embedded below for more information:

  1. Your username suggests that you are associated with the company. If this is true, you must disclose this connection, as it is a conflict of interest. I advise you to read Wikipedia's plain and simple conflict of interest guide to see what kind of editing is acceptable in this situation.
  2. Simply adding information to an article and telling the reader to check the company's website for verification is not good enough. The burden of evidence is on the contributor, and you must add proper inline references to verify the content you add. Information in an article must be verified by a reliable source that is independent of the article's subject. In this case, the company website is a primary source, which is OK for verifying basic information but not interpretations of that information. Secondary sources are preferred.
  3. Reverting and re-adding the same information repeatedly, without discussion on the article's talk page, is not going help your content survive. If anything, it displays signs of ownership, which is looked down upon by the community, and will just give you a poor reputation. Article content is formed by consensus and editors are expected to discuss major changes before they are implemented.

--Drm310 (talk) 13:59, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I'm from the company but I only want to put rights informations on this wikipedia page because the former version of this page had incorrect informations.
Very well, thanks for disclosing your connection. Please discuss the changes you think should be made at Talk:Elipsos. Also, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when. Thank you. --Drm310 (talk) 15:15, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Renfe-SNCF en Cooperación

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Renfe-SNCF en Cooperación, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 09:49, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply