User talk:Millelacs/Archive 4

Just updating the archive links above

Hi, DCI! I happened to notice a bunch of entries on recent changes about your username change, and when I came to your userpage, I noticed that your archives were redlinks, still pointing at the old archive locations. I've taken the liberty of pointing them to the new ones; I hope you don't mind! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 20:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much; I don't mind at all. dci | TALK 21:57, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Charles of La roche sur yon

I just translated it from the French wikipedia. I might copy the references there later. Reigen (talk) 03:40, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Colonial New England

Template:Colonial New England has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. dci | TALK 03:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

hello

hello, thanks, come back.Bhavinkundaliya (talk) 21:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Cattle Egret

Thanks, I'm sure the vandals will have their fun, but it's quickly reverted on main page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:51, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Edmund Andros, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falmouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:45, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 09:41, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

You're most certainly welcome DCI2026, and thank you for your note of appreciation. :)  -- WikHead (talk) 21:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

Hi DCI2026. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! CharlieEchoTango (contact) 22:59, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Ionian Islands under Venetian rule

Hello there!! I add some things about WW2 Italian occupation in Legacy. What do you think?? --Marcofran (talk) 12:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

newmanrs psilocybin article edits

I'm very disappointed that you wrote on my talk page accusing me of making joke edits without viewing the revision history of the page. Did you not check the revision history? (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Psilocybin&diff=479549988&oldid=479548855)? I said I was removing incoherent vandalism, and I stand by my statement, unless you can substantiate the claims that psilocybin is used for nuclear medicine and that all microbiology labs are inherently bad for your health.

The fact that you would write on my talk page without even verifying whether or not the edit was a joke appalls me. It suggests (at least in my perceptions) that you care more about being smug to other editors than building better articles. Please check for vandalism first, accuse later.

I will continue reverting vandalism that I see to articles and cleaning them up, and not just "play" in a sandbox as you suggest. Have some trust, and check your histories before you accuse. Incidents like these drive many editors off of Wikipedia and leave it for the worse. Newmanrs (talk) 01:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)