Your submission at Articles for creation: Grover House Middletown New Jersey (March 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:13, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, MildJoeMA! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:13, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Working on a page based on a webpage

edit

@Curb Safe Charmer:

Hello Curb Safe Charmer,

Thank you for the feedback. I am a co-manager of the Navesink Maritime Heritage Association website, along with a social media manager. We want to add pages on Wikipedia for Grover House and NHMA, pointing back to our website and other related resources. I do understand we don't want to simply duplicate what we have on the webpage, so what else might I add or modify so that our information is published on Wikipedia for the public to find?

I will also be working on a page for NHMA itself, because there is already at least one reference to us under the acronym "NMHA". Again, I will start with our website's posted information of course, since it does describe us well. I'm rewriting it to remove self-references, and will add further information that helps people understand the history and purpose. What else can you advise?

Regards,

MildJoeMA MildJoeMA (talk) 15:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

(talk page watcher) Wikipedia is not a directory, so an organization is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. All topics must be notable by Wikipedia's definition to merit inclusion. In the specific case of an organization, it must meet the notability criteria for companies and organizations. For this to happen, the organization must have already received significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. We have no interest in what an organization wishes to say about itself, as this is an inherent conflict of interest. You will have to provide sufficient evidence of third-party coverage for this organization to merit inclusion.
Regarding using your own website's content, you cannot post copyrighted material on Wikipedia - even if you are the copyright holder, or have the copyright holder's permission - unless the material has been released for use by the verified copyright owner into the public domain or under a license compatible with Wikipedia. These licenses allow anyone — not just Wikipedia — to share, distribute, transmit, and adapt your work, free of charge and in perpetuity, provided that you are attributed as the author. Also, because some derivative works may be commercial, we cannot accept materials that are licensed only for educational use or even for general non-commercial use. Releasing the material is both permanent and irrevocable. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:55, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, MildJoeMA. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Navesink Maritime Heritage Association, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:15, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Draft:Navesink Maritime Heritage Association

edit
 

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Navesink Maritime Heritage Association has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://navesinkmaritime.org/page-1221061. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. — Diannaa (talk) 22:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply