Welcome edit

Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages. You may also want to check out Wikipedia:Merge, for information about merging, renaming and moving pages. The Wikipedia directory is also quite useful. In addition, you might want to add yourself to the new user log; if you made any edits before getting an account, you may wish to assign those to your username.

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

Finally, here are some open tasks:


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

Other links for reference: Wikipedia:Wikiquette, image copyright tags, Wikipedia:Merge

Hope to see you around the Wiki! Remember to be Bold! with your edits, and if you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Who?¿? 08:16, 18 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

You're fine edit

I never thought you were being snarky. Don't worry about it. I took a look and didn't see any vandalism though...glad I could help.Gator (talk) 20:15, 16 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Grynszpan edit

I don't think you read my edit very carefully. I haven't suggested that he survived the war. Eichmann saw Grynszpan in 1943 or 1944 so his date of death must have been between 1944 and the end of the war (ie, 1944-45).

This is an extract from Eichmann's testimony at his trial:

    Grynszpan [I was told]...in...was late in the War
    ...in...during the War - it must have been in 43 - or
    44 - I was hardly - in 43 Grynszpan was...this is it: I
    received some...some...in the line of my duty I
    received an order that Grynszpan was in custody in
    Prinz Albrechtstrasse 8, and he had to be further
    examined concerning who was likely to have been behind
    the scenes. Accordingly I gave instructions to bring
    Grynszpan no, not this way - accordingly Krischak gave
    orders - Krischak was dealing with the matter - to
    bring Grynszpan and...either way it would have been
    useless, I said to myself. I still remember exactly,
    for I was curious to see what Grynszpan looked like.
    For this reason I can still remember this very well,
    and I still said: Will they - more or less thus - if
    they had not found this out during all those years,
    then this will also...this examination will also be
    pointless, this would be useless, but an order was an
    order. Grynszpan - er - Krischak questioned him and
    took notes. Nothing, obviously, emerged from the whole
    thing and I merely said then to Krischak that if he had
    completed the interrogation, I wanted him to bring him
    to me upstairs, for I very much wanted - for once - to
    look at the man Grynszpan. I wanted to talk to him. And
    I did then, exchange a few words with Grynszpan. He was
    very brief (abweisend) and brusque, was indifferent and
    gave short replies to all the questions. I wanted to
    ask him, since I had no knowledge at all of the whole 
    matter, where he had been and things of that kind. On
    the whole he looked well, he was small - he was a
    smallish lad - I have absolutely - I don't know if I am
    wrong but this I remember - such a...he was such a
    little man - this is still preserved in my memory; and
    then he was again returned to custody in Prinz
    Albrechtstrasse 8. What happened then I don't know.

I will add this to the article. Adam 23:58, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

So far as I know there is no precise information on when, where or how HG died. It's pretty clear that he was dead by the end of the war. If he had survived we would have heard something about it by now. We know that he was in Gestapo custody when Eichmann saw him in 43 or 44. Probably they killed him when it was obvious that there was no further use for him. This is different to Baeck, who was a priviliged detainee at Theresienstadt (he also saw Eichmann, in March 45 when Eichmann vistited. He said, "I see you are still alive, Dr Baeck." To which Baeck replied, "Indeed I am, Herr Eichmann, and I will outlive you," which wasn't quite an accurate prediction, but not far off.) Adam 00:39, 18 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Dorothy-thompson.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Dorothy-thompson.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 14:54, 15 March 2006 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:James alison.JPG edit

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:James alison.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 20:55, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:HG Arrested.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:HG Arrested.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thuresson 13:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:HG_Car.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:HG_Car.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 11:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Frank Lorenzo edit

Mike, thanks a ton for cleaning up that Lorenoz page. Wikilore and his alias Redstoneranger have been rewriting history for months now. Thanks a ton for shutting that fraud down.! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.219.235.234 (talk) 01:51, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Factual edits to Lorenzo's page edit

Hi Mike - please refer to my post on the discussion board on Frank Lorenzo. I believe we can come to an agreement on what the bio says (and stop wasting each other's time editing back and forth) if we stick to the facts, whatever they may be. I have no interest in portraying Frank's bio in a biased way, and would like to keep it factual. I look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Wikilore —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikilore (talkcontribs) 18:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Frank Lorenzo edit

Hi, I understand what you are doing here but the reality is you should be treating me as just another editor who has some extra tools, not anything special as an admin. Now, if you agreed that the POV removal was appropriate, that's fine but the idea that I or User:Frank have some extra authority as admins is incorrect. Also note that any admin that attempts to tell you such or act like that is wrong. Period. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply