Welcome! Hello, Mike Teavee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --*drew 23:44, 12 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Can you please explain to me why you made this edit [1] on Differences between book and film versions of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Thank You.

The Chocolate Room

edit

Please don't remove the Article for Deletion message. If you want to comment, please do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chocolate Room. -Walter Siegmund 21:15, 16 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

I'm disappointed to see that you deleted the Article for Deletion message again. It is not in keeping with the spirit of reasoned discussion and cooperation that is the foundation of Wikipedea. It will not prevent your article from being deleted or merged, if that is the sense of the community discussion; indeed, the outcome may be more unfavorable to your point of view if you ignore the establish procedures of the community. Please demonstrate good faith by restoring the Article for Deletion message. Again, you are welcome to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chocolate Room, here, or on my talk page. -Walter Siegmund 21:54, 16 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Deletions

edit

I've deleted some of your articles, all of the format "_____ is a character in the novel _____." If you wish to recreate them, please consider writing longer articles that actually describe the characters for people who haven't read the books. tregoweth 11:47, 27 October 2005 (UTC)Reply


previewing pages before editing

edit

please press the 'Show Preview' button after making edits. you seem to edit a lot but not check the page before changes are made to see if it is in the correct state. i have had to revert a page after you edited it and the text and pictures were overlapping making it unreadable. i know you are trying to help wikipedia by editing articles, but by not previewing your edits beforehand, they are becoming more of a nuisance than anything else. regards,

--Rachel Cakes 05:43, 30 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Scary Godmother

edit

Hey there,

I see that you've turned all of the character names in the article into links. Considering that there's plenty of room in the main article for all of the character descriptions as they stand and that there's not much more relevant information to be shared about them (and that for someone looking for information about Scary Godmother, it's far more convenient to have that information available in a single location rather than spread around numerous small articles), I don't really see the point. What's your plan there? (Uh, I see from the comments above that you've previously created numerous articles in the "_____ is a character in the novel _____" format. I sincerely hope that you're not attempting to do that now.) -- Captain Disdain 00:51, 31 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Puffle

edit

An editor has nominated Puffle, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puffle and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Puffle

edit

Puffle, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Puffle satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puffle (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Puffle during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. SpigotMap 00:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Club Penguin

edit

I have nominated Category:Club Penguin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BencherliteTalk 18:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Big Bad Wolf (Shrek)

edit

I have nominated Big Bad Wolf (Shrek), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Bad Wolf (Shrek). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Far Far Away

edit

I have nominated Far Far Away, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Far Far Away. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of The Complete Adventures of Charlie and Willy Wonka

edit

I have nominated The Complete Adventures of Charlie and Willy Wonka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 16:57, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Roald Dahl task force!

edit
Hello, Mike Teavee, We are wondering if you would like to join the Roald Dahl task force as you have contributed a lot to the articles in our scope. We hope you can join!

Please feel free to add to this list. If you feel a task has been completed feel free to remove it and start a new one!

  1. Become a member of the task force and encourage others to do so.
  2. Tag articles for the task force.
  3. Improve: George's Marvellous Medicine.
  4. Improve: Going Solo.
  5. Work on all Roald Dahl related articles mainly focusing on stubs.
  6. Assess articles on class and importance.
  7. Get Roald Dahl to FA or GA

sillybillypiggy¡SIGN NOW OR ELSE! 17:20, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Kevin C. Cucumber listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kevin C. Cucumber. Since you had some involvement with the Kevin C. Cucumber redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:23, 17 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of Shrek characters for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Shrek characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Shrek characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Throast {{ping}} me! (talk | contribs) 22:24, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Gingy" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Gingy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 7 § Gingy until a consensus is reached. 2607:FEA8:761B:C900:4DD9:7138:4DA4:D669 (talk) 17:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply