User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 37

Latest comment: 5 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Administrators' newsletter – September 2018

Wikidata weekly summary #324

This Month in GLAM: July 2018

 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bernard F. Burke, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Marblehead, White Mountains and National Research Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

links

Hi Mike!

Pls help me respectively link enwiki articles Malokilikili, Falea (island), Ewose, Laika (island), Lelepa Island, Tongoa, Maskelyne Islands, Kakula Island, Rowa Islands ---- with those in cebwiki Malokilikili, Faléa, Éwosé, Laïka, Lelepa Island, Tongoa Island, Îles Maskelynes, Kakula Island, Rowa Islands.

These all are islands of Vanuatu. Cebwiki is quite exhaustive but poorly linked with other wikis.

Thanx! Lamro (talk) 13:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Should all be done now. Purge each page to check that the language link is correct. The problem was that on Wikidata each of the items was duplicated with minor spelling variants, I've merged each pair of them on Wikidata. Cheers --RexxS (talk) 17:14, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #325

link

Hi

Please help me link Metoma in dewiki with Metoma in enwiki. I am not able to do so somehow.

Thanks!

Lamro (talk) 14:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

@Lamro: Done, there were two Wikidata entries for them that needed merging together. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:01, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Infobox bridge

Your change to this template caused many articles (about 900 at last count) to show up in Category:Pages with malformed coordinate tags for reasons that are opaque to me but seem to have to do with Wikidata coordinates' being suddenly displayed in articles that already contained {{coord}} templates. I've therefore reverted the edit. (And I'm getting more and more irritated by folk that seem to be more concerned with promoting Wikidata than with the integrity of en.wp content.) Deor (talk) 22:32, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

@Deor: I made the change so that the coordinates from the article are available in the API. The problem is {{coord}} is being used outside of the infobox, so we're ending up with two coordinates in one article, hence the error. So reverting is a good interim step (and thanks for doing so), but we ultimately need to fix the problem by moving the coordinates into the infobox. I might look into writing a bot that will do that at some point. In general, Wikidata is a useful tool that can bring a lot of benefits here, and should improve the integrity of enwp in the long run, not make it worse. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Really needs some better documentation about things that matter, is nosave or save mentioned ?
How do we use things when we don't know they exist or what they do or why ? Dave Rave (talk) 23:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Weaver's cottage

Hi, Mike Peel, I noticed you (your bot?) where looking for an image on "1 Bacup Road", I was wondering if this file is suitable. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 06:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Lotje: That would be suitable, perhaps you could add it to 1, Bacup Road (Q26328727)? I guess you've seen User:Mike Peel/NHLE no image with commonscat? It's an (automatically updated) list of historic UK buildings that don't have an image defined in their Wikidata entry but do have a linked Commons category, so they are highly likely to have suitable pictures available. The image will then show in the infobox in the Commons category, as well as helping the UK WLM team focus attention more on getting photos of buildings that we don't yet have a photo of. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  Done Lotje (talk) 04:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #326

Facto Post – Issue 15 – 21 August 2018

Facto Post – Issue 15 – 21 August 2018
 

The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.

Neglected diseases
 
Anti-parasitic drugs being distributed in Côte d'Ivoire
What's a Neglected Disease?, ScienceSource video

To grasp the nettle, there are rare diseases, there are tropical diseases and then there are "neglected diseases". Evidently a rare enough disease is likely to be neglected, but neglected disease these days means a disease not rare, but tropical, and most often infectious or parasitic. Rare diseases as a group are dominated, in contrast, by genetic diseases.

A major aspect of neglect is found in tracking drug discovery. Orphan drugs are those developed to treat rare diseases (rare enough not to have market-driven research), but there is some overlap in practice with the WHO's neglected diseases, where snakebite, a "neglected public health issue", is on the list.

From an encyclopedic point of view, lack of research also may mean lack of high-quality references: the core medical literature differs from primary research, since it operates by aggregating trials. This bibliographic deficit clearly hinders Wikipedia's mission. The ScienceSource project is currently addressing this issue, on Wikidata. Its Wikidata focus list at WD:SSFL is trying to ensure that neglect does not turn into bias in its selection of science papers.

Links

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Heads up

Just that, re your remark at RfA, have a quick look here, particularly the bottom...if you see what I mean? I guess you missed it, sorry. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap sh*t room 11:10, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

@Serial Number 54129: Ah, thanks for the pointer, I hadn't spotted that. I haven't been watching the pages, I was just checking back on the RfA today after seeing the watchlist notice again. Hopefully my ping doesn't take them back to commenting on the RfA then. TBH, I skipped over most of their comments and just focused on the answering the parts that seemed worth clarifying, both for them and for others. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:28, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Point

Stop disrupting Wikipedia to make your point. Your infobox edits at Julie Leclerc have not improved the article at any time, and should stop. Deliberately repeatedly inserting an infobox with less information just because it is the type of infobox you prefer is not acceptable. You have had similar problems with the Unesco infobox, I hoped that you would have learned something from that episode but apparently not. Fram (talk) 11:28, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

@Fram: I would say exactly the same to you and Nikkimaria. Consider that the infobox in this case was using info from Wikidata from the start (the editor that started the article used the wikidata version of the infobox), and this bout of editing only started because you both don't like Wikidata and decided to change to a manual infobox (which didn't add significantly more information than the Wikidata one did). Mike Peel (talk) 11:57, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
It did add more information. You reverted it back, thereby making it worse. I'm not surprised that you consider your action (making it worse) the same as ours (making it better), but I doubt that most people would agree. Fram (talk) 17:41, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
There's a very big difference between IDONTLIKEIT and recognizing the limitations/issues with regards to integration of Wikidata with enwiki, such as differences in sourcing standards and editing philosophies. Dismissing those issues won't make them go away, and will only contribute to what seems to be a growing divide in the project (at least based on recent RfCs). Let's start from an assumption that everyone has reasons for their changes other than just liking or not liking something, so we can discuss rationally whether in a particular case integration is or isn't a net positive. IMO the template that kicked this off - introducing unsourced info in a BLP - was not; thank you for adding appropriate sources for that information. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:08, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
 
Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:07, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #327

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

This Month in Education: August 2018

 
Wikipedia Education globe
This Month in Education

Volume 4 | Issue 8 | August 2018

This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

In This Issue
From the Community

The reconnection of Wikimedia Projects in Brazil

Christ (DU) students enrolls for 3rd Wikipedia certificate course

Educational wiki-master-classes at International "Selet" forum

54 students help enrich the digital Arabic content

From the Education Team

Mapping education in the Wikimedia Movement

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 03:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  None
  AsterionCrisco 1492KFKudpungLizRandykittySpartaz
  Optimist on the runVoice of Clam

  Interface administrator changes

  AmorymeltzerMr. StradivariusMusikAnimalMSGJTheDJXaosflux

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a "stop-gap" discussion, six users have temporarily been made interface administrators while discussion is ongoing for a more permanent process for assigning the permission. Interface administrators are now the only editors allowed to edit sitewide CSS and JavaScript pages, as well as CSS/JS pages in another user's userspace. Previously, all administrators had this ability. The right can be granted and revoked by bureaucrats.

  Technical news

  • Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 12 September and 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour.
  • Some abuse filter variables have changed. They are now easier to understand for non-experts. The old variables will still work but filter editors are encouraged to replace them with the new ones. You can find the list of changed variables on mediawiki.org. They have a note which says Deprecated. Use ... instead. An example is article_text which is now page_title.
  • Abuse filters can now use how old a page is. The variable is page_age.

  Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee has resolved to perform a round of Checkuser and Oversight appointments. The usernames of all applicants will be shared with the Functionaries team, and they will be requested to assist in the vetting process. The deadline to submit an application is 23:59 UTC, 12 September, and the candidates that move forward will be published on-wiki for community comments on 18 September.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2018 (UTC)