MiguelAngel fotografo
Joined 6 February 2009
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Asqueladd in topic Warning
Warning
editPlease stop with the edit warring, single-purpose editing, and source hijacking. I do not need to "look" at "anything". In this site, article-naming will be under the purview of a specific set of sources and policies, none of which are concerned with an es.wikipedia talk page thread. Also please read WP:TRUTH, WP:MEATPUPPET (most specifically Wikipedia:Tag team).--Asqueladd (talk) 15:10, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- But what are you talking about? Why are you talking in the plural we? There is a cited English-language source, which as of now, you are repeateadly hijacking together with the other user (in an incredibly disruptive fashion).--Asqueladd (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- In any case a plurality of English-language names will be attested. Why do you approach article naming in terms of "demonstration" as if it were a mathematical theorem (or a revealed truth?) That is a quite non-sensical approach. Ah, you will "demonstrate" nothing (because we don't do original research): English-language sources will (or won't). In the meantime, could you abide to WP:BRD and return the article to the statu quo ante? Warning: from now on, in light of the plural we, and the unmistakable edit pattern, I will fully assume you are coordinating off-wiki with the other user with some form of non-transparent WP:CANVASSing at play. Don't do that. And last (for now), but not least, what on Earth are you thanking me in the edit summary pertaining your last edit-warring effort in that article? Condescending passive-agressive bullshit is not welcome.-Asqueladd (talk) 15:38, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- But what are you talking about? Why are you talking in the plural we? There is a cited English-language source, which as of now, you are repeateadly hijacking together with the other user (in an incredibly disruptive fashion).--Asqueladd (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)