Mightythos77

This is Mightythos77's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 21)

Latest comment: 24 days ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Felix Albrecht Harta, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mightythos77/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kline • talk • contribs 18:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Mightythos77! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kline • talk • contribs 18:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

The earlier submission was done by my aunt. She has published at least one article before and thought she could publish a stub for me so I could work on it but that too had been published, deleted and rejected. She resubmitted it for some reason, so I am asking there a way she can delete her submission, so mine can move up the queue as it were? Or if that is still being considered, can I just edit copy/ paste mine into her draft? Hers is a tiny stub, while mine is weeks of work and pretty much an entire article. I honestly ask if you saw both and what can I do to have hers disregarded and mine finally published? This isn't a competitive thing. She thought she was doing me a favor by trying to publish, but since her initial submission was published and deleted I have been building and refining the article in my sandbox. We thought because of it's veracity and volume that hers would just be rejected again. Mightythos77 (talk) 21:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Just work on it and submit it for review when you are ready.

Do not tag team with your aunt. That is meat puppetry. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ok Thank you. I am going to resubmit it because there is no tag teaming going on, just me working in an unfamiliar space. Thanks again. Mightythos77 (talk) 17:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felix Albrecht Harta (May 24)

Latest comment: 24 days ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Felix Albrecht Harta (2), which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Felix Albrecht Harta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 18:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why did you submit this for review? That is a rhetorical question. If you don't want to use it, leave it alone and just submit the other one, whcih appears to be more complete 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sincere apologies. I tried to submit the one from the sandbox, the more complete one. I was given the option to submit this as Draft:Felix Albrecht Harta and when I did it looked like the tiny stub had been submitted instead. I messed up. So I resubmitted the more complete one immediately. I sincerely apologize for the confusion. Now when I go to the "Draft" page it looks correct where it didn't before. Mightythos77 (talk) 19:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felix Albrecht Harta (2) (May 26)

Latest comment: 22 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If you're going to use the referencing method of dynamic inline citations and footnotes, please do it correctly. This draft has 15 citations (in the 'References' section) correctly formatted, plus another 34 (listed under the 'Notes' section) that don't work and/or don't make sense. See WP:REFB and WP:ILC for advice.

When citing the same source multiple times, the use of named references is recommended; see WP:NAMEDREFS. Do not use "ibid" and similar internal referencing, as this does not work with Wikipedia articles which tend to evolve over time, with content added, deleted, moved around, etc.

While offline sources are acceptable, they need to be cited with sufficient bibliographical details to enable them to be reliably identified for verification purposes; see WP:OFFLINE for more information. (And obviously, online sources would be highly preferred, where available.)

All sources must be published, private archives, correspondence, registry entries, etc. are not acceptable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Felix Albrecht Harta (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felix Albrecht Harta (2) (June 13)

Latest comment: 4 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Draft:Felix Albrecht Harta. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Felix Albrecht Harta (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic