Michael Krhovjak
Welcome! edit
Hello, Michael Krhovjak, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Cabayi (talk) 08:30, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
May 2019 edit
Hello, I'm Creffett. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Statute of limitations, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. creffett (talk) 16:26, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
User talk:Michael Krhovjak edit
I don’t need to provide a source, I’m the one that created the definition. Michael Krhovjak (talk) 16:51, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Then that would be original research, which also isn't allowed. creffett (talk) 16:53, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
I updated my edit with a source and people keep removing it, which is why I’m upset.
Edit Warring Policies edit
Michael, please review the Wikipedia policies on edit warring, including the the three revert rule. If you want to try to justify the changes you made to the statute of limitations article, or do not understand why your edits are being removed, please start a discussion on the article's talk page. Thanks. Arllaw (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Michael Krhovjak, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Michael Krhovjak! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 8 May 2019 (UTC) |
May 2019 edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Statute of limitations. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 07:46, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
In response to the message you left & deleted on my talk page...
"Thank you for your degrading words Wiki police."
"Wikipedia is not a credible source at most, if not all college campuses. Due to this, almost nothing posted on this website can be used in academic writing."
- It's not a credible source on Wikipedia either. Wikipedia is WP:UGC. That's why we ask for reliable, verifiable, independent sources so that readers can check for themselves what they read on Wikipedia. If people blindly copy what's on the wiki into their academic submissions they deserve what they get. Even if the content is correct the act is plagiarism.
"Also, how is my edit unconstructive?"
- Because you're repeatedly adding the same material and ignoring the comments of other editors. The wiki's way of working is WP:BRD, not BRBRBRBRBRBR...