If you are here to leave a message asking for permission to re-use material from messybeast.com, please email me instead (contact info is on the website). I have become so discouraged that it may be months between visits to my talk page. Despite GFDL notices at the foot of many of my webpages, Wikipedia authors continue to cite copyvio, even on my own edits. How can I plagiarise myself? So I figured I might as well stick to doing research for my own site and not bother contributing to Wikipedia pages. If you want to reproduce material I've researched, email me via the website where you found the material in question. Messybeast (talk) 17:11, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply


Copyvio against my own own work?

edit

I have just had to recreate White Panther from scratch. In spite of my mutant bigcats page on messybeast.com displaying a notice that text is licenced, someone decided the White Panther article was copyvio and deleted. This is very discouraging and makes a mockery of the GFDL licence notice displayed on that page. Messybeast 21:40, 25 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

6th Dec 2005: I am a newbie to Wikipedia tho I've previously given permission for text/images from my works and websites to be reproduced on Wikipedia by other users. My field of knowledge is genetics/felids. Please forgive my errors that result from inexperience. I've created an a/c because I use a shared IP address (with a few 1000 others) and not all edits from that IP are mine.Messybeast 06:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please do not automatically assume text content reproduced from messybeast.com is copyvio. I gave permission for other Wikipedians to use content. Also, it isn't plagiarism of the Messybeast hybrids webpages - how can I plagiarise myself? Messybeast 06:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please note the Messybeast website is sometimes slow (very occasionally offline) due to server maintenance. Please don't assume it is a dead link! I have given permission for some of the photos (pumapard, polar/brown bear hybrid) to be uploaded to Wikipedia if someone with more experience than me wishes to do this. Messybeast 06:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Added photos of Polar/Brown bear hybrid, Jaglion, hybrid pig, Pumapard. All photos my own work released to Wikipedia (my own website was suffering outages and people could not see images).Messybeast 08:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:Baby-MSIM.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Baby-MSIM.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


Image was already tagged when uploaded. Can't see what the problem is.Messybeast 07:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

File:Yn04yjr-not-in-service2.jpg

edit

Hi! There's a problem with the above file. There's currently no license on it and a bot will come around sooner or later and tag it for deletion. You might want to have a look at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags to decide what you want to do. Adding {{pd-self}} or similar on the file's page will sort the problem out! Arriva436talk/contribs 17:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply


edit
 
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Yn04yjr-not-in-service2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:24, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Trawler Spaniel

edit

Hey there,

I noticed that several of your images from your website messybeast.com taken at the Rothschild Zoological Museum have been uploaded on Wikimedia Commons. Is there any chance you'd consider uploading the shot taken of the Toy Trawler Spaniel as I'm currently gathering sources to put together an article on the English Wikipedia about the breed as I have a keen interest in Spaniels. I'm happy to do it myself with your permission, but I thought you'd probably prefer to take the full credit for the great image.

Thanks, Miyagawa (talk) 14:17, 29 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

It's 5 years late, but have a welcome template! [These get erratically distributed on a whimsical basis (automated greeting messages have been argued against for years...). I was just doing some cleanup at cat breed articles, and kept noticing your wonderful messybeast resource. Let me know if you ever need any Wikipedia assistance; I can generally find the right help-page to find out answers, from our sea of them all...!] -- Quiddity (talk) 21:16, 12 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Template-style welcome-message follows. Please forgive the one-tone-fits-all phrasing!

Hello, Messybeast, welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are a few pages that you might find interesting and helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages (the discussion tab) using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date.

Don't be afraid of making mistakes, as all changes are kept, and problems can be easily reverted with the "history" tab of each page.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Quiddity (talk) 21:16, 12 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Messybeast.com

edit

I believe this is your website? Some material has been used to expand the Falkland Islands Wolf article, would you be able to expand on the sources used. WP:RSN indicated that it needed additional cites, would you be able to help? Wee Curry Monster talk 19:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I gave a colleague permission to update the article during his lunchtime, it inlcuded referenced source articles (mostly ship's journals held in the British Library or Maritime Musuem, but he said you yourself kept undoing the changes. The source quotations are in public domain (1910 or earlier) but he got a copyvio warning. So to be honest I really don't see any point helping you (by permitting a colleague to update the article) as you simple delete it again. In fact that's why I don't bother editing articles any more - it's evident from all the "undo" activities that Wikipedia authors simply aren't interested in researched, sourced articles complete with references. Messybeast (talk) 16:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

It was neither researched or sourced. He cut'n'pasted a load of quotes, all were unattributed. He then pasted a list of book titles, in some cases duplicating ones that were already there. I've already spent a lot of time cleaning the article up and as you failed to respond found alternative cites and removed messybeast.com, which as an WP:SPS is not considered a reliable source. I asked for help with cites to support certain facts, however, your friends ham fisted approach was unhelpful.
I will happily help anyone find their way and my first action was to give your friend pointers and I would have been happy to explain things further. Instead he ignored that to repeat an action that raised a concern of WP:COPYVIO by cut'n'pasting wholesale from another website and inserted an edit that was unhelpful. My query was prompted by cleaning up after a new editor created a problem with a wholesale copyright violation on this and related articles.
You appear to have gone off half-cocked without fully checking your facts. Wee Curry Monster talk 20:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I am sorry that you feel you own that page. Material copies from Messybeast.com was not a copyvio. Since you evidently feel so proprietorial over that page I am not giving Wee Curry Monster permission to use the contents.

Did you ever confirm your account with OTRS? Wee Curry Monster talk 22:03, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Mexlapdog-1862.jpg missing description details

edit
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:14, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation

edit

Your upload of File:Amherstxgolden.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:51, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mexican Hairless Cat

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mexican Hairless Cat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from pawpeds.com/pawacademy/history/thebookofthecat/hairlesscats. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dat GuyTalkContribs 10:59, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please do not cut and paste content from clearly copyrighted websites into Wikipedia. While the original accounts (which are inappropriately long for blockquotes) may be out of copyright, the messybeast material is clearly copyrighted. Please either rewrite using the text as a source, or provide evidence of permission either on the original site or via OTRS. We can't accept the "used with permission" without better proof of control of that content. Acroterion (talk) 11:43, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


Acroterion - I AM messybeast. I cannot copyvio my own work. The quotes are public domain and fully referenced. |Everything else is reworded from my original work on my own website. I write wiki articles in parallel with my own website. This inability to use my own work is one reason i quite editing on wikipedia - there is a distinct lack of anything resembling common sense if an author cannot use his/her own work. What is OTRS?

I don't actually doubt that you are, but we can't accept it on face value, too many others have abused it to the detriment of the authors that the rule is iron-clad: either there must be an appropriate CC-by-SA notice on the content, or there must be clear evidence of use provided by OTRS. Since Wikipedia is a free website, content that is copy/pasted in must be obviously free. I think most of what you've posted is OK, but I can't tell what is doubtful, and when in doubt, it must go. It's a sometimes unfortunate outcome of WP being a free-content website. I'm glad to help you through the process if you need help supplying the appropriate assurances via email to OTRS (not to me). Acroterion (talk) 11:55, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

OK. I do not want to GFDL my whole original page, but I want to make the correct information about the breed (which I spent considerable time researching for the benefit of cat lovers) available. Almost all of the content I wrote is fully referenced to the original newspapers and books and very little is my own commentary.

I understand, I usually advise people to make private acknowledgement via OTRS instead of CC-by-SA-ing pages too (it's not GFDL anymore, by the way, that conversion took place a few years ago). Take a look at WP:DCM, that has the best information. Remember, what was deleted can easily be restored. Acroterion (talk) 12:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

OTRS email already sent. I am reinstating the page with additional edits. I appreciate your help. Will I applaud caution, I think editors also need to be careful in not shouting "copyvio" on public domain text that is demonstrably available from multiple sources and multiple formats.

I've added an OTRS -pending template to the talkpage so reviewers will see that it's in process. Acroterion (talk) 12:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks.

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mexican Hairless Cat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pedigree. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 19 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Bicolour Cat Patterns.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Bicolour Cat Patterns.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kuttappan Chettan (talk) 02:42, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply