Messworthy

November 2016

Hello, I'm Eric-Wester. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one or more of your recent contributions to Alexander Grischuk because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Eric-Wester (talk) 01:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Peter Leko. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. --SubSeven (talk) 04:04, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Discussion on chessgraphs.com links

Hi, could you please join this discussion at the WikiProject Chess talk page before you add any more links to chessgraphs.com? Several wikiproject chess members are questioning the appropriateness of these links. MaxBrowne (talk) 23:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Why did you ignore my request and go back to your link bombing? MaxBrowne (talk) 08:31, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Since your entire history consists of adding in links to chessgraphs.com

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. LionMans Account (talk) 20:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 21:08, 4 February 2017 (UTC)