Mengfei zhang

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Mengfei zhang. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! sonia♫ 08:14, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it when you believe the concerns have been addressed. (To resubmit the submission, add the text {{subst:submitdraft}} to the top of the page)

• To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Smokefoot (talk) 20:38, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

The article contains useful content that is lacking in Wikipedia. My worry is that the article is at least partly copied from published sources, one clue being the table of the conditions-yield data. Also the writing is of very high quality and the referencing is too. The main problem is that the author makes zero effort to integrate with the exisiting article on Hydroboration–oxidation reaction, which ostensibly focuses on a more specialized process but also discusses much material in this artible. I would not accept until the integration step is taken.--Smokefoot (talk) 20:38, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hydroboration.
• To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! sonia♫ 06:57, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Here's how it works here

You surrender ownership of an article once it is on Wikipedia. Maybe we should have explained that. Others are free to edit your work and you are free to edit theirs. Large changes are usually discussed before they are made (as we did with your contribution). You are welcome discuss your ideas at Talk:Metal-catalysed hydroboration or at Talk:Hydroboration. Let us know. Most of us check daily and these processes can take weeks.--Smokefoot (talk) 20:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC)