Melissastevens, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Melissastevens! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Lone Star Funds new logo.png edit

 

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Spencer Wharton Brown edit

Hello Melissastevens,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Spencer Wharton Brown for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 11:49, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Spencer Wharton Brown edit

Hello, Melissastevens,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Spencer Wharton Brown should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer Wharton Brown .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 12:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Adrian Untermyer edit

Hello, Melissastevens,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Etzedek24 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Adrian Untermyer, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Etzedek24}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 20:39, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Adrian Untermyer edit

Hello, Melissastevens,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Etzedek24 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Adrian Untermyer should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Untermyer .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Etzedek24}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 19:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Meg Gentle for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meg Gentle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meg Gentle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Clarityfiend (talk) 04:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply