User talk:Mel Carter/Textbook 2 Edit Sandbox

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Christina geo

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

edit

Name of student reviewer: Christina geo

Date of review: 5/15/13

Name of editor: User:Mel_Carter

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mel_Carter

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:

Date review submitted to instructor: 5/15/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): Perfect length

Image (needed/appropriate): not needed

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes

Wikiformatting: Correct formatting

Grammar & composition: Great grammar and composition

Other comments: Very nice format, clear, and straight to the point

--Christina geo (talk) 00:07, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Name of student reviewer ** Wikipedia User: Angela Sandy
Date of review 5/5/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Mel_Carter
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mel_Carter
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/16/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 5/16/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) The length of the article is good
Image (needed/appropriate) Not necessary
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Textbook information is accurate.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed n/a
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Info accurate for I/O Psych
Wikiformatting The format is good
Grammar & composition Well done
Other comments Might want to add some more info for more credit.

Angela Sandy (talk) 23:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply