Mdavidholmes

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Michele Greene has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'mysite\.verizon\.net' (link(s): http://mysite.verizon.net/mdavidholmes/MicheleGreene.jpg) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 04:53, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:MGreene.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MGreene.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

I had the permission notice for the photo but didn't know you were more interested in your made up rules than actual copyright law. Again your statements and libelous. I should have learned but I tried to help again. I hope this thing implodes from it's own arrogance. BTW you folks have many copyrighted photos and images so I'll start reporting this to the right sources. Have fun. --- dh

April 2012

False and libelous accusations. This is the last time I will try to help you dudes get things correct. Your article is flawed and inaccurate on the Auricon and doesn't even have a photo of a REAL Auricon.

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Auricon. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Breawycker (talk to me!) 22:47, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

False and libelous accusations. This is the last time I will try to help you dudes get things correct. Your article is flawed and inaccurate on the Auricon and doesn't even have a photo of a REAL Auricon.

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Auricon. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Breawycker (talk to me!) 22:48, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

False and libelous accusations. This is the last time I will try to help you dudes get things correct. Your article is flawed and inaccurate on the Auricon and doesn't even have a photo of a REAL Auricon.

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Auricon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Breawycker (talk to me!) 22:55, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=False and libelous accusations. This is the last time I will try to help you dudes get things correct. Your article is flawed and inaccurate on the Auricon and doesn't even have a photo of a REAL Auricon ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 23:08, 8 April 2012 (UTC)