Salad! edit

Cookies! edit

  Summer Sbernar1 (talk) 10:21, 2 May 2017


Hi Mayson edit

Thanks for the note! Glad you're feeling good about your statement. Also, nice flair with the Vampire Weekend shout out.Prof Haeffel (talk) 02:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinical versus Statistical Prediction (April 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 01:23, 28 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Clinical versus statistical prediction edit

 

The article Clinical versus statistical prediction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An essay, rather than an article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Clinical versus Statistical Prediction concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Clinical versus Statistical Prediction, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Clinical versus Statistical Prediction edit

 

Hello, MaysonND1010. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clinical versus Statistical Prediction".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 17:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply