Your submission at Articles for creation: Fred W. Weber (March 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Onel5969 (talk) 19:51, 7 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! MaxtonRoxEric, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 19:51, 7 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: Fred W. Weber (March 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was: You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. — kikichugirl oh hello! 23:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fred W. Weber (March 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fred W. Weber (October 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 19:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

When a web page has a notice saying "All Rights Reserved", it seems unlikely that the content is licensed for free reuse, as it is or modified in any way whatever, for any purpose whatever, which is what you declare when you post it to Wikipedia. If you won the copyright and wish to release it under such free terms, then get the notice on the web site changed to say so. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply