User talk:Max rspct/archive3

Latest comment: 18 years ago by XYaAsehShalomX in topic terrorism against the state

September 11, 2001 attacks

edit

Hi; On the talk page it says

A sitewide policy on the words "terrorist" and "terrorism" is under discussion at Wikipedia:Use of the word terrorism (policy development). There is a truce on the words for this article.

I understand this to mean that in the first paragraph the word should be terrorist rather than operative. What do you think? Tom Harrison (talk) 13:35, 28 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Theres been no discussion since June 2005/its not policy .. see your talkpage -max rspct
  • Just to let you know that you have performed 3 reverts in the last hour on this article and a fourth is a violation of WP:3RR. While I'm no big fan of blocking people for a 3RR violation, since it appears you have concerns over the content in the article, I encourage you to contribute to the talk page there. Thanks.--MONGO 15:28, 28 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your reply. I started the discussion on your talk page, but I think we should continue it on the article's talk page, for people's convenience. Tom Harrison (talk) 15:37, 28 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Ok-max rspct

Max, you're real close to me reporting you for a violation of WP:3RR. I want to make it clear that I am not going to block you, but somone else may. I strongly urge you to contribute to talk as to why you believe that the term terrorist in the September 11, 2001 attacks article is so contentious to you.--MONGO 16:18, 28 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
Mr. Harrison has apparently reported your reverts[1]. You'll probably avoid a block if you stop reverting to your version and I again encourage you to contribute substantive argument on the talk page of the article mentioned. Thanks!--MONGO 16:37, 28 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Reply to your comment on my talk page: This inaccurate number comes from a November 11, 2001 article which appeared in the Daily Telegraph before the official number of deaths from the terrorist attacks was determined. The quote was not to show this number to be accurate, but intended to accurately quote bin Laden saying "we are terrorists", since it was disputed that bin Laden had made this admission. patsw 18:05, 5 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Marconi Scientists

edit

Hi, If this appeared on BBC I'd certainly reconsider my Afd nom. Can you point me to an online source for the Scandal program? Thanks Dlyons493 Talk 13:59, 2 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

RJII and Hogeye POV on Wikiquote

edit

Hi, I need your help on Wikiquote where RJII and Hogeye made their @capitalist private playground named "Definitions of anarchism". They behave like bolshevik censors there. http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Definitions_of_anarchism

Yes I have already noted this. I will try to help - You in favour of it being merged or not? - max rspct

I'm not. I don't know why it sholud be merged. This is now almost a personal notebook of RJII and Hogeye, full of quotations taken out of context. --XaViER 11:53, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Warriors of the Boer Nation

edit

No prob - thanks for creating the article! :D XYaAsehShalomX 18:35, 6 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

British Forces Rangers

edit

The Special Reconnaissance Regiment is not the final realisation of the "British Rangers" (now officially confirmed as the Joint Special Forces Support Group). The former is the latest incarnation of 14 Intelligence Company, and officially became operational on 6th April 2005 (see this MoD press release); the latter will be 1 Bn Parachute Regiment, possibly supported by elements of the Royal Marines and RAF Regiment, and may become operational sometime next year: see this MoD site, which mentions 1 PARA's departure from 16 Air Assault Brigade to form the JSFSG.

The JSFSG will be essentially a conventional (but elite) light infantry unit; the SRR specialise in covert surveillance (though they are trained to fight if needs be). Read The Operators by James Rennie for an idea of the kind of job the SRR do (though this book is about their former incarnation in Northern Ireland). — Franey 19:17, 6 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Little Fluffy Clouds

edit

It's good ... I just corrected some of the grammar and stuff in it. You might wanna add a link to the lyrics, though. How are you, btw? :) XYaAsehShalomX 19:02, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Better now that I've solved the origin of the lyrics.. 15yr mystery. How iz u over in Bucks? I used to live in Stukeley (village) ;) -max rspct

Im doing allright, yeah :) I'm trying to do a stupid essay but apart from that everything's fine. ;) you up to anythin intrestin? XYaAsehShalomX 19:48, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

I have to admit I dont know anything about Yoruba, no ;) I replied on my own talk page...lol sorry i'm not all that used to this. :D XYaAsehShalomX 14:51, 9 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

LOL! nah, ive never heard of anything like that. I know a bit about Voodoo though, I went to a Haitian dance show once called Voodoo Nation and it was excellent. LOL, picking too many religious subjects in deed...you're probably right there :D I haven't really worked on anything like that recently tho...:) I don't know if Vorster counts as a religious subject, except if some madman decided to worship him for some reason (and they'd really have to be mad). :D

As for your edit summary - LOL! I don't need that shit, no. Madonna's a bit of a loony and although my friend seems to be in love with her, I'm not really, and never have been. Anyone who buys holy mineral water and thinks it will bring about world peace has to be demented, IMO. XYaAsehShalomX 15:19, 9 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Nar, he ain't on the national curriculum, but I just happen to know a bit about his mysterious case because most of my family come from South Africa, my uncle joined the anc at a young age and they were involved in the anti-apartheid movement. as for etb ... stupid nazi guy, I don't know a great deal about him. Its funny but at one point either my uncle or a friend of his was in prison alongside a Terrorist from the AWB, (my uncle was convicted of terrorism against the state!) lol, i try to keep him away from madonna but ... what can you do? blokes,eh? :D

You're one of the funniest people I've met on Wikipedia, and I haven't met many, so maybe thats not saying alot but you seem cool XYaAsehShalomX 16:48, 9 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economic fascism 2

edit

DO NOT edit a closed AFD, my notes where to clarify my thoughts when closing the AFD and should not be edited just as you would not edit a user's statement on a talk page. If you continue you may be blocked as editing a closed AFD page can qualify as vandalism. JtkieferT | C | @ ---- 20:53, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Also since you accused me of bias I might as well answer those accusations here as well. I am in no way biased towards either side of this debate and indeed my role as the closing administrator forbids me from having any part in the debate and if I was involved in the debate or had a view on it I would either forsake my own view as part of the job or I would more likely just move on to the next AFD on the list and let one of the other 500+ admins close it. JtkieferT | C | @ ---- 21:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

I think we need help

edit

I'm almost sure that Hogeye gone mad. I think that we need help of administrators. I don't know how to stop this edit war. --XaViER 20:12, 9 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:LF04.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:LF04.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --SCEhardT 22:17, 9 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Babylon and Ting

edit

See this? Towers of Dub LoopZilla 22:48, 9 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

terrorism against the state

edit

Yeah lol, he was in the ANC and plotted to blow a South African government television station up...he woulda done it if they hadn't caught him. fortunately nobody woulda been in the building at the time...

Thanks mate - I'll add you to my yahoo later. i shouldnt really be online tho right now, but someone musta turned the computer on or something...:) XYaAsehShalomX 11:35, 10 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Who was in the ANC? LoopZilla 11:59, 10 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

my uncle :)

im not sure if he was in the umkhonto we sizwe actually, but it sounds like the sorta thing he got up to, although he never killed anyone thank g-d...he's round at the minute staying for a few days...there's a lot i dont know about it, and that i want to talk to him about,but i just never got round to asking ............ XYaAsehShalomX 14:39, 10 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

LOL!! XYaAsehShalomX 14:49, 10 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

"cool"

edit

lol i'm not surprised it has that many tags...it looks like complete bollocks! XYaAsehShalomX 17:51, 10 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

I think I've seen some stuff by this person before. Lol - I thought he was a girl at first, actually. Obviously not...XYaAsehShalomX 18:02, 10 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

I never thought of that - max

Have u got msn or anythin else like tht, by any chance? its abit annoying just talkin on here - rach (XYaAsehShalomX 18:21, 10 December 2005 (UTC))Reply

Ah, OK :) my yahoo is XXXX..add me if u want, dont worry if u can't at the minute :) XYaAsehShalomX

its XXXX..XYaAsehShalomX

k thas cool :) speak to you soon xx XYaAsehShalomX