As Laurence67 wrote on Bogdanov affair's talk page, it is absolutely ridiculous to think that I could be another Bogdanov's sock-puppet : I've been protesting against their mystification for far 1 year (especially in France), I've created (with my colleagues YBM and Romnulphe) 2 french forums where we denounce it, etc. There are at least 7 persons (YBM, Romnulphe, Alain R., Laurence67 --who is a real person, that makes no doubt--, Igor, Catherine and Professeur YIN) who can confirm it right here.

Yet, I would not be so affirmative with regard to "A. de Parme" who says belonging to the french government : I would even say that I am almost sure he(she) is a bogdanov's clone : he(she) commits the same ponctuation mistakes, uses only autority arguments, etc. Moreover, googling his(her) name gives no result as it can be seen there : [1], what is very astonishing for someone who seems to have so great responsibilities.

Furthermore, I do not understand why you (Driny) have blocked me without having warned before, whereas I had respected every wikipedia rules ; you would have been to analyze the situation more calmly.

Bests,

Max.

--Max.Epiphysique 20:21, 27 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Unblocked

edit

I have unblocked you, since the clues that you might be a sockpuppet of Igor Bogdanov seem weak, and several people protested that you were not. You are thus welcome to contribute again, in the friendly and constructive manner that we all prefer. Rama 19:26, 29 September 2005 (UTC) Suspected sockpuppets of BogdanovReply


Thank you for having unblocked me, since there were no reason for me to be so.

Quant à "A. de Parme" et autres clones, les Bogdanov ont toujours usé de telles méthodes sans en voir ni les limites, ni les conséquences. A eux d'assumer ces dernières. A propos de l'article, pas de soucis : je respecterai (comme à mon habitude) les différentes règles de Wikipedia, même si cela peut ne pas être simple quand on suit cette affaire de près depuis longtemps comme je le fais. Bonsoir. --Max.Epiphysique 21:52, 29 September 2005 (UTC)Reply