Hi point firearms

edit

A tag has been placed on Hi point firearms, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hatch68 20:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Nikki Neals

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nikki Neals, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Neals. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ecoleetage (talk) 01:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Laurie Smith (pornographic actress)

edit

I have nominated Laurie Smith (pornographic actress), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurie Smith (pornographic actress). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Epbr123 (talk) 00:18, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply