Matt.thomsen

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark A. Thomsen

Hello Matt.thomsen,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mark A. Thomsen for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. geordie (talk) 19:38, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Status and Advice

As reviewing administrator, I thought it showed some indications of plausible importance, but I am not sure whether it will amount to actual notability. What the article must have is references (normally reviews of performances) providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. See WP:N, and also WP:Autobiography. If you have such references , it will also need rewriting so it seems less like a resumé. To start with, don;t use his name so much-- He is the best substitute, and combine the material into longer paragraphs. I advise you to fix the problems, and do this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. DGG ( talk ) 20:14, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Update and References

DGG, I've reworded and shifted the article to get rid of the resume-like flow. As for citations, they may take a bit of time to collect. Mr. Thomsen's web page has references to reviews at http://www.markthomsen.com/reviews.shtml, but many of the articles may be one or two decades old. I'll have to see if a lexis search or the microfiche section of my local library can narrow down the quotes to specific issues of the various publications mentioned. I'd like to plead for leniency on this particular aspect while I gather the specific citations.

Trip to LOC

I will be driving to the Library of Congress on the weekend of May 3, 2014. I should be able to find a large number of support citations for the Mark A. Thomsen article in their periodical archives.

Edit: Trip complete. I got there a bit later than planned, but managed to get my reader card and just over a dozen good citations using ProQuest. Too bad that service isn't available outside of major libraries.

Copyright problem: Mark A. Thomsen

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mark A. Thomsen, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.markthomsen.com/bio.shtml, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mark A. Thomsen and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Mark A. Thomsen, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Mark A. Thomsen with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mark A. Thomsen. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Mark A. Thomsen saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Voceditenore (talk) 12:36, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Matt, the above was the formal notice. Per our conversation here, the text cannot remain visible on Wikipedia until permission is verified, hence the blanking template. If you choose to work on a completely new version of the article instead (which I strongly recommend), please do not paste the copyright text into the temporary page and try to modify it there. It will be speedily deleted. The re-write must be in completely original text from the outset. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to contact me. Voceditenore (talk) 12:47, 7 May 2014 (UTC)