Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Ponyobons mots 20:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maths23 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I did nothing just created an account and reported a user.

Decline reason:

Clearly abusive WP:LOUTSOCK going on here. Yamla (talk) 21:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maths23 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I swear this is a public network not me pls give me a chance to prove this is not misleading.. Maths23 (talk) 21:04, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Attempting to mislead us will count against you in any future unblock request. I incredibly strongly advise you to take down that open unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 21:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I did nothing I swear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maths23 (talkcontribs)

I strongly oppose unblocking this user. --Yamla (talk) 21:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Why? Maths23 (talk) 21:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Is browser version same? Maths23 (talk) 21:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Yamla Maths23 (talk) 21:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Does the checkuser data show an exact match"? Maths23 (talk) 21:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply