Your submission at Articles for creation: Datar–Mathews Method for real option valuation (November 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 02:25, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, MathewsSH! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 02:25, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

COI notice

edit

  Hello, MathewsSH. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 02:31, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your article Draft:Datar–Mathews Method for real option valuation

edit

Hello and Welcome to Wikipedia! I would just like to let you know that the article you created Draft:Datar–Mathews Method for real option valuation has been redirected to the existing article Datar–Mathews method for real option valuation. If you would like to improve the current article that already exists on Wikipedia, please do so! Thank you. Train of Knowledge (talk) 07:07, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Editing of Datar-Mathews method for real option valuation

edit

AngusWOOF, you are cited as an most recent editor for this web page article submission. I hardly know where to start this conversation, but let's begin.

First, there are two versions of this article. The first is one that was submitted and published by Wikipedia in March 2012 with minor revisions since. The second is an extension to the first (original) article that I submitted in Draft form to Wikipedia on or about Nov. 15, 2019. The second article contained some revisions to the original article plus extensive additions (3 sections) of new material including formulas, graphs and illustrations. I spent almost 6 months developing the second article including external review by SMEs. All of that seems to have disappeared and is now replaced with the original article but now includes various warnings, and none of the extensive additions.

Somehow in my efforts to follow Wikipedia protocol on revamping an older article (the original), I somehow not only lost significant work of the additions but seem to have set off a series of alerts. I am at loss as to how to respond, but here is what I propose as first steps:

Recover the full extent of the article material I submitted on Nov. 15, 2019. I do want to get that work back. Engage with me about how I may proceed to add or amend the original article (that of March 2012) with this new material of extensive additions. If there is a concern about COI, I am more than willing to answer all questions, though I assure you there is no COI involvement. Finally, how can I engage you (or someone) by text/phone/whatever so that these issues can be addressed and settle expeditiously?

Thank you for your involvement in this. MathewsSH (talk) 00:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Scott H MathewsReply


Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:10, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Looks like there will be another discussion on COI as I notice updates to option pages. Limit-theorem (talk) 23:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
I am glad to have a financial mathematician involved in refining my Wikipedia submissions.
There is no COI as I understand it. This webpage is dedicated to a practical discussion of several financial mathematical patents, all of them referenced.
The only COI issue I can imagine surfaced when I submitted several years ago a revision to the original webpage, and I naively overwrote or recreated that original webpage along with the revision. It was my error as I was, and mostly still am, an amatuer Wikipedia page editor. I apologize for any missteps as I write my contribution. I can use your @Limit-theorem knowledgeable guidance.
MathewsSH (talk) 18:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Scott MathewsReply
P.S. I now reside in Mexico, and occasionally used a VPN to aid in my international communications. MathewsSH (talk) 18:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply