User talk:Masonbissada/sandbox3
I think each of these looks interesting. How about applying the notability test to your preferred candidate?
==
Fabiola Peer Review
- First, what does the article do well?
The page set up is visually pleasing. It is organized and the episode descriptions are detailed. Is there anything from your review that impressed you? The episode breakdowns contain attention to a span of numerical and categorical information. Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? The phrase "...celebrates the Star Wars movies in sequential order..." captures its subject. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Maybe add some more references. Why would those changes be an improvement? It would offer the reader understanding towards its place within culture. What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Maybe add more detail in some episodes. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? The attention to numerical and categorical data is something that I could apply towards my own article. ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fababean (talk • contribs) 03:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)